Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40232707›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

Binding in visual working memory is task dependent.

Ruoyi Cao, Leon Y Deouell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruoyi CaoEdmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Leon Y DeouellEdmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory is a neurocognitive system for maintaining and manipulating information online for a short period after the source of information disappears. The information held in working memory has been shown to flexibly match current functional goals. Considering this, we revisited the question of whether information is held in working memory as separate features or as bound objects. We conjectured that, rather than having a fixed answer, the format in which information is maintained in working memory is also task dependent. In two separate experiments, we investigated the binding between features when the location was not (Experiment 1, color and orientation binding) or was (Experiment 2, color and location binding) a task-relevant feature in a delayed (yes/no) recognition task by manipulating the relative relevance of conjunctions and separate features. Each experiment included two conditions: binding dominant (BD), which emphasized the retention of binding between features, and feature dominant (FD), which emphasized the retention of individual features. In both experiments, we found that memory for conjunctions was better in the BD condition and that memory for separate features was better in the FD condition. These patterns suggested that the formats of objects in visual working memory could be shaped by the tasks they serve. Additionally, we found that the memory of location was impaired when the conjunction between location and color was task irrelevant, whereas the memory of color and the memory of orientation were relatively independent of each other. We conclude that the representation format of objects in working memory is influenced by task requirements.

Indexed as

Color PerceptionMemory, Short-TermPattern Recognition, VisualVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationRecognition, PsychologyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40232707
PMCPMC12007687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.