ArticleJournal of vision2025
Binding in visual working memory is task dependent.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Object-based attention sustains feature binding in working memory without requiring strategic control.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Working memory as a representational template for reinforcement learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Working memory is a neurocognitive system for maintaining and manipulating information online for a short period after the source of information disappears. The information held in working memory has been shown to flexibly match current functional goals. Considering this, we revisited the question of whether information is held in working memory as separate features or as bound objects. We conjectured that, rather than having a fixed answer, the format in which information is maintained in working memory is also task dependent. In two separate experiments, we investigated the binding between features when the location was not (Experiment 1, color and orientation binding) or was (Experiment 2, color and location binding) a task-relevant feature in a delayed (yes/no) recognition task by manipulating the relative relevance of conjunctions and separate features. Each experiment included two conditions: binding dominant (BD), which emphasized the retention of binding between features, and feature dominant (FD), which emphasized the retention of individual features. In both experiments, we found that memory for conjunctions was better in the BD condition and that memory for separate features was better in the FD condition. These patterns suggested that the formats of objects in visual working memory could be shaped by the tasks they serve. Additionally, we found that the memory of location was impaired when the conjunction between location and color was task irrelevant, whereas the memory of color and the memory of orientation were relatively independent of each other. We conclude that the representation format of objects in working memory is influenced by task requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.