Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40232704›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2025

Mesothelioma Incidence Rates in Australia since 1982: Exploring Age, Period, and Cohort Effects and Future Projections.

Karen Walker-Bone, Melissa A Goodwin, Brent Bufton, Brett Andrew Davis, Henry Wong, Justin Harvey, Sue Barker, Elizabeth Chalker, Sonja Klebe, Sarita Prabhakaran and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Trends in malignant mesothelioma incidence in Spain, 1999-2023: a joinpoint and age-period-cohort analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Karen Walker-BoneMonash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, MonCOEH, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5992-1459
Melissa A GoodwinAustralian Institute for Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0009-0007-7150-6366
Brent BuftonAustralian Institute for Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-5941-4439
Brett Andrew DavisAustralian Institute for Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0009-0000-5115-6134
Henry WongAustralian Institute for Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-2442-8319
Justin HarveyAustralian Institute for Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0009-0000-8281-4283
Sue BarkerAustralian Institute for Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-0739-4364
Elizabeth ChalkerAustralian National University College of Health and Medicine, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1593-3770
Sonja KlebeCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Health and Medical Research, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8976-4714
Sarita PrabhakaranCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Health and Medical Research, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3252-2519
Fraser J H BrimsCurtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6725-7535
Ewan MacFarlaneMonash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, MonCOEH, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8946-3196
Geza BenkeMonash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, MonCOEH, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9019-9364
Kathleen MahoneyAsbestos Safety and Eradication Agency, Surry Hills, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-5423-3480
Timothy R DriscollSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0057-2490

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of asbestos-containing products was banned in Australia in 2003. However, the rates of new cases of mesothelioma, which has a very long latent period between exposure and disease, have continued to increase. The aim of this study was to investigate mesothelioma incidence in Australia by year of birth and age-period-cohort analysis and to develop projections of expected mesothelioma cases until 2034.

methodsData were derived from the Australian Cancer Database which provides complete national records of mesothelioma cases notified between 1982 and 2020. Incidence rates were age-standardized to the 2001 Australian standard population to enable comparisons of the population across time. Age-period-cohort models were used to examine the temporal trends of incidence rates by age, calendar year, and birth cohort. Projections for incidence rates of mesothelioma for 2020 to 2034 were estimated using Nordpred models.

resultsGraphs of age-standardized incidence rates of mesothelioma suggest a birth cohort effect, and the age-period-cohort model confirmed this. There was a birth cohort effect in all cohorts born before 1960, strongest in cohorts born during 1920 to 1949. Projection modeling to 2034 suggested that the age-standardized rates will continue to decline whereas crude incidence rates of mesothelioma will stabilize and then gradually decline, mostly among people of 60 to 84 years of age.

conclusionsThe findings are consistent with the greatest risk of mesothelioma in Australia occurring in cohorts with the highest levels of historical cumulative occupational exposure, showing the value of a ban on asbestos. IMPACT: The number of new cases of mesothelioma per year is not expected to decline until after 2030.

Indexed as

MesotheliomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAsbestosAustraliaCohort EffectCohort StudiesFemaleForecastingHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAsbestos

Identifiers

PMID40232704
PMCPMC12209811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.