ArticleJournal of ultrasound2025
Wrist and elbow fracture detection and segmentation by artificial intelligence using point-of-care ultrasound.
Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning models for detecting wrist and distal forearm fractures in pediatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Emergency radiology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for In-Flight Detection of Space-Related Ocular Trauma: Bridging Diagnostic Gaps in Microgravity.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in fracture detection with ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The ultrasound journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDistal radius (wrist) and supracondylar (elbow) fractures are common in children presenting to Pediatric Emergency Departments (EDs). These fractures are treated conservatively or surgically depending on deformity severity. Radiographs are typically used for diagnosis but can increase wait times due to the need for radiation-safe rooms. Ultrasound (US) offers a radiation-free, faster alternative that can be performed at triage, but its noisy images are challenging to interpret.
methodsWe developed an artificial intelligence (AI) technique for the automatic diagnosis of fractures at the wrist and elbow. While most AI for diagnosis focuses on classification results only, we applied a more explainable pipeline that used US bony region segmentation from a CNN as the basis of fracture detection. Our approach was validated on 3,822 wrist US images and 1487 elbow US images. We compared the fracture detection results from classification models and multi-channel segmentation models.
resultsCombining the segmentation results with the original images showed superior performance in fracture detection at the individual patient level, achieving an accuracy of 0.889 and 0.750, sensitivity of 0.818 and 1.000, and specificity of 1.000 and 0.714 on the wrist and elbow dataset respectively. Besides, the multi-channel U-Net architecture effectively detected bony fracture regions in wrist US images.
conclusionThese findings demonstrate that AI models can enable reliable, automatic wrist and elbow fracture detection in pediatric EDs, potentially reducing wait times and optimizing medical resource use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.