Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40232666›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2025

Overlap of 'disorders of gut-brain interaction' and their impact on quality of life and somatization in a tertiary care center- A cross-sectional study.

Omesh Goyal, Prerna Goyal, Manjeet Kumar Goyal, Khushi Jain, Vandana Midha, Ajit Sood

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. What is new in Rome V?: Redefining diagnostic criteria and clinical pathways in disorders of gut-brain interaction.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Omesh Goyal *Department of Gastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, 141 001, India. goyalomesh@yahoo.co.in.ORCID 0000-0002-6347-0988
Prerna Goyal *Department of Medicine, R.G. Stone and Super Speciality Hospital, Ludhiana, 141 002, India.
Manjeet Kumar GoyalDepartment of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Khushi JainDepartment of Medicine, Gian Sagar Medical College and Hospital, Rajpura, 140 506, India.
Vandana MidhaDepartment of Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, 141 001, India.
Ajit SoodDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, 141 001, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs) constitute a global health challenge. Overlapping DGBIs amplify the clinical severity and have a profound impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and somatization. Data on the prevalence and overlap of all individual DGBIs and their clinical ramifications remains limited. This study sought to elucidate these aspects within a northern Indian tertiary healthcare setting.

methodsThis prospective cross-sectional study enrolled patients meeting Rome IV criteria for DGBIs and healthy controls (HC). Participants underwent elaborative assessments, including socio-demographic profiling, HRQoL evaluation (PROMIS Global-10) and somatization quantification (PHQ-12). Statistical analyses compared prevalence rates, overlap patterns and associated clinical outcomes between various groups.

resultsOf the 2538 patients screened, 1044 (41.1%) with DGBIs (age 41.7 ± 12.6 years, 51.9% males) were enrolled; along with 1021 age and gender-matched HCs. Most common gastrointestinal region involved was gastroduodenal (49.9%), followed by bowel (39.7%) and esophageal (33.3%). Most common DGBIs were functional dyspepsia (FD; 44.4%), functional esophageal disorders (FEsD;32.4%), functional constipation (FC;18%), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS;16.1%). Overlapping DGBIs were present in 40.3% patients, with FD-FEsD (23.9%) and FD-FC(22.1%) and FD-IBS (52;12.4%) overlaps being the most common. Compared to HC, DGBI patients had significantly poorer HRQoL scores (19.1 ± 0.7 vs. 13.52 ± 3.39; p < 0.001) and significantly increased somatization scores (2.5 ± 1.7 vs. 18.5 ± 0.7; p < 0.001). Further, patients with overlapping DGBIs had significantly poorer HRQoL and significantly increased somatization scores compared to non-overlapping counterparts.

conclusionsThis study provides novel data on the clinical burden and the entire spectrum of overlapping and non-overlapping DGBIs, while studying their impact on HRQoL and somatization. DGBI patients had significantly poorer HRQoL and heightened somatization compared to HCs; with further detriments observed in those with overlapping DGBIs. These findings emphasize the need for an integrated multidisciplinary approach for the evaluation of possible overlaps and for assessment of HRQoL in all patients with DGBIs to improve clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

BrainGastrointestinal DiseasesQuality of LifeSomatoform DisordersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceProspective StudiesTertiary Care CentersConstipationDiarrheaDyspepsiaFunctional gastrointestinal disordersIrritable bowel syndrome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.