Trial reportInfection2025
Efficacy of tocilizumab for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and high IL-6 levels: A randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tocilizumab versus sarilumab among adults hospitalised with COVID-19: target trial emulation across England and Scotland.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IL-6 driven personalized treatment strategy with tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. TRIAL
designRandomized, controlled, open-label, single-center trial of a tocilizumab treatment strategy in adult patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and IL-6 serum levels > 40 pg/mL.
methodsPatients were randomized 1:1 to receive standard of care (SOC) or SOC plus one dose of tocilizumab. The primary outcome was death or need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) within 28 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included ICU admission, days on IMV and hospital stay. A meta-analysis of clinical trials to evaluate the effect of tocilizumab on mortality and need of IMV in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia was performed.
resultsSixty-two patients were included: 30 in the SOC arm and 32 in the standard-treatment plus tocilizumab arm. The primary outcome occurred in 12.9% in the tocilizumab arm and 32.3% in the SOC arm(p = 0.068). There was a trend towards fewer days on IMV (7.5 vs 19.5 days, p = 0.073) and a shorter hospital stay (4 vs 8 days, p = 0.134) in the tocilizumab group. No serious adverse events were reported. The meta-analysis revealed a RR for death or IMV of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89) in patients receiving tocilizumab, compared to patients receiving SOC.
conclusionTocilizumab could be effective to prevent death or IMV in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and high IL-6 serum levels. Safety profile of tocilizumab does not arise major concern in patients with severe COVID19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.