ArticleAnalytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry2025
Breath biomarkers for esophageal cancer: identification, quantification, and diagnostic modeling.
Article in Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systematic comparison of methods for offline breath sampling.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is a major global health issue with a high mortality rate. Early diagnosis is crucial for improving patient outcomes, but traditional diagnostic methods are often invasive and costly. This study explores the potential of exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for esophageal cancer. Using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), we analyzed the breath samples of 80 esophageal cancer patients and 60 healthy controls, identifying and quantifying over 100 VOCs. The results revealed significant differences in the concentrations of VOCs such as acetone, ethanol, and isoprene between the two groups. A multi-parameter regression diagnostic model based on a neural network algorithm achieved an accuracy of 90.3% in distinguishing esophageal cancer patients from healthy individuals. Further optimization incorporating physiological factors, including smoking, drinking, and dietary habits, improved the model's accuracy to 92.4%, with a specificity of 93.1%, representing a significant improvement over previous studies. These results suggest that VOCs analysis in exhaled breath holds great promise as a non-invasive, cost-effective, and accurate method for early detection of esophageal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40232623What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.