Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40232623›Full record

ArticleAnalytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry2025

Breath biomarkers for esophageal cancer: identification, quantification, and diagnostic modeling.

Yuke Ren, Fei Wang, Ziyi Zhu, Raojun Luo, Guojun Lv, Haibin Cui

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Systematic comparison of methods for offline breath sampling.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuke RenKey Laboratory of Clean Energy and Carbon Neutrality of Zhejiang Province, State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization (Zhejiang University), Hangzhou, 310027, China.
Fei WangKey Laboratory of Clean Energy and Carbon Neutrality of Zhejiang Province, State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization (Zhejiang University), Hangzhou, 310027, China. wangfei@zju.edu.cn.
Ziyi ZhuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016, China.
Raojun LuoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016, China.
Guojun LvKey Laboratory of Clean Energy and Carbon Neutrality of Zhejiang Province, State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization (Zhejiang University), Hangzhou, 310027, China.
Haibin CuiKey Laboratory of Clean Energy and Carbon Neutrality of Zhejiang Province, State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization (Zhejiang University), Hangzhou, 310027, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LTGY24H160013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is a major global health issue with a high mortality rate. Early diagnosis is crucial for improving patient outcomes, but traditional diagnostic methods are often invasive and costly. This study explores the potential of exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for esophageal cancer. Using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), we analyzed the breath samples of 80 esophageal cancer patients and 60 healthy controls, identifying and quantifying over 100 VOCs. The results revealed significant differences in the concentrations of VOCs such as acetone, ethanol, and isoprene between the two groups. A multi-parameter regression diagnostic model based on a neural network algorithm achieved an accuracy of 90.3% in distinguishing esophageal cancer patients from healthy individuals. Further optimization incorporating physiological factors, including smoking, drinking, and dietary habits, improved the model's accuracy to 92.4%, with a specificity of 93.1%, representing a significant improvement over previous studies. These results suggest that VOCs analysis in exhaled breath holds great promise as a non-invasive, cost-effective, and accurate method for early detection of esophageal cancer.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBreath TestsEarly Detection of CancerEsophageal NeoplasmsVolatile Organic CompoundsAdultFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisBiomarkersVolatile Organic CompoundsBreath analysisEsophageal cancerNeural networkVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.