Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40232619›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025

Acute side effects of proton and photon radiotherapy for medulloblastoma: a retrospective national multicenter study.

Linn Söderlund Diaz, Måns Agrup, Anna Asklid, Anna Embring, Jacob Engellau, Ingrid Fagerström Kristensen, Anna Flejmer, Charlotta Fröjd, Martin P Nilsson, Anna Maja Svärd and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Linn Söderlund DiazDepartment of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Blå Stråket 2, Gothenburg, 413 46, Sweden. Linn.soderlund@vgregion.se.
Måns AgrupDepartment of Oncology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Anna AsklidDepartment of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna EmbringDepartment of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jacob EngellauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Ingrid Fagerström KristensenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Anna FlejmerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Charlotta FröjdDepartment of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Blå Stråket 2, Gothenburg, 413 46, Sweden.
Martin P NilssonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Anna Maja SvärdDepartment of Oncology, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
Angelica WalfridssonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Malin BlomstrandDepartment of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Blå Stråket 2, Gothenburg, 413 46, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA comparison of acute toxicity between photon and proton radiotherapy (RT) for children undergoing treatment for medulloblastoma.

methodsThis retrospective multi-institutional cohort study included 96 children < 18 years treated for medulloblastoma in Sweden during 2008-2020. Patients treated with protons (n = 37) and photons (n = 59) were compared regarding acute side effects and radiation dose to intracerebral organs at risk (OARs). Data was collected from a prospectively maintained national database and was supplemented from a retrospective review of medical records. Acute symptoms were graded according to CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events), maximum grade occurring during RT and within 2 months after RT. Hematological toxicity was evaluated according to maximum grade and percentual reduction during RT.

resultsNo significant differences in incidence or severity of acute symptoms were observed between proton-RT and photon-RT; grade ≥ 2 fatigue (5.4 vs. 10.2%), headache (2.7 vs. 3.4%), nausea (43.2 vs. 42.4%), dermatitis (5.4 vs. 15.3%), gastrointestinal toxicity (0 vs. 0%), weight loss (10.8 vs. 8.5%). Median percentual reduction (0% vs. -11,25%) in hemoglobin was significantly smaller during proton-RT (p < 0.001). No difference was observed for leucocytes, neutrophiles, or platelets. Absorbed mean dose to intracranial OARs was significantly lower with proton-RT.

conclusionThis is one of the largest studies comparing acute side effects of proton-RT and photon-RT including only paediatric medulloblastoma patients. Proton-RT was safe and well tolerated regarding acute side effects. Absorbed dose to intracranial OARs was significantly lower with proton-RT. Further investigations of long-term side effects and cognitive evaluation is needed to show that this will translate into true clinical value for patients.

Indexed as

Cerebellar NeoplasmsMedulloblastomaPhotonsProton TherapyRadiation InjuriesAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesSwedenAcute toxicityCraniospinal irradiationHematologic toxicity.MedulloblastomaProton radiation

Identifiers

PMID40232619
PMCPMC12170764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.