ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Automated pulmonary nodule classification from low-dose CT images using ERBNet: an ensemble learning approach.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning method for analyzing CT images with varying doses and qualities, aiming to categorize lung lesions into nodules and non-nodules. This study utilized the lung nodule analysis 2016 challenge dataset. Different low-dose CT (LDCT) images, including 10%, 20%, 40%, and 60% levels, were generated from the full-dose CT (FDCT) images. Five different 3D convolutional networks were developed to classify lung nodules from LDCT and reference FDCT images. The models were evaluated using 400 nodule and 400 non-nodule samples. An ensemble model was also developed to achieve a generalizable model across different dose levels. The model achieved an accuracy of 97.0% for nodule classification on FDCT images. However, the model exhibited relatively poor performance (60% accuracy) on LDCT images, indicating that dedicated models should be developed for each low-dose level. Dedicated models for handling LDCT led to dramatic increases in the accuracy of nodule classification. The dedicated low-dose models achieved a nodule classification accuracy of 90.0%, 91.1%, 92.7%, and 93.8% for 10%, 20%, 40%, and 60% of FDCT images, respectively. The accuracy of the deep learning models decreased gradually by almost 7% as LDCT images proceeded from 100 to 10%. However, the ensemble model led to an accuracy of 95.0% when tested on a combination of various dose levels. We presented an ensemble 3D CNN classifier for lesion classification, utilizing both LDCT and FDCT images. This model is able to analyze a combination of CT images with different dose levels and image qualities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.