Observational studyJournal of hematopathology2025
Demystifying the evaluation of a "dry tap".
Observational study in Journal of hematopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- On-Scanner Correction of Gradient Nonlinearity Bias for Accurate Assessment of Diffusion Heterogeneity Across Bone Sites in Myelofibrosis Patients.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
"Dry tap" refers to the failed aspiration of bone marrow hematopoietic elements. Faulty technique is frequently blamed for a dry tap. But, often, the dry tap is associated with an underlying bone marrow pathology. This study aimed to evaluate the causes of dry tap and assess its clinical relevance. This retrospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Pathology over a period of 1 year, from 1 November 2023 to 31 October 2024. A total of 1327 bone marrow aspirates were reviewed. The definitive diagnosis was established by examining the trephine biopsy. A total of 267 aspirates, for which biopsy was not performed or which had suboptimal biopsies, were excluded from the study. A total of 1060 cases were taken for the final study. We attributed 125 (11.8%) cases that were aparticulate and grossly hemodiluted to a "dry tap." Of these, only 20 (16%) of the dry tap could be attributed to improper or faulty technique because their trephine biopsy was adequate and satisfactory for evaluation. An underlying bone marrow pathology, which could plausibly be the reason for dry tap, was identified in 105 (84%) patients. The most common cause was found to be acute leukemia, accounting for 32.8% of the cases. The laboratories should periodically review the cases yielding a dry tap, and if the corresponding biopsies are adequate, then one must focus on improving the technique of bone marrow aspiration. Moreover, a dry tap should serve as a diagnostic alert rather than a basis for disregard of the operator's technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40232604What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.