ReviewProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2025
Exploring Innovative Approaches for Managing Spinal Cord Injury: A Comprehensive Review of Promising Probiotics and Postbiotics.
Review in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bibliometric analysis of research on spinal cord injury and the gut microbiota.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Phage-Microbiota Interactions in the Gut: Implications for Health and Therapeutic Strategies.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Molecular mechanisms of gut microbiota dysbiosis and metabolites in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis: implications for precision therapeutics.Molecular brain · 2025Review
- Gut Microbes and Inflammation: Their Role in Spinal Cord Injury Progression and Secondary Damage.Current microbiology · 2025Review
- Gut-Spinal Cord Axis in Spinal Cord Injury: Bidirectional Inflammatory Mechanisms and Microbiota-Targeted Therapeutic Strategies.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) affects millions of people worldwide annually, presenting significant challenges in functional recovery despite therapeutic advancements. Current treatment strategies predominantly focus on stabilizing the spinal cord and facilitating neural repair, yet their effectiveness remains uncertain and controversial. Recent scientific investigations have explored the potential of probiotics and postbiotics to modulate inflammation, influence neurotransmitters, and aid in tissue repair, marking a potential paradigm shift in SCI management. This review critically evaluates these innovative approaches, emphasizing their ability to harness the natural properties of microorganisms within the body to potentially enhance outcomes in SCI treatment. By analyzing the latest research findings, this review provides valuable insights into how probiotics and postbiotics can revolutionize inflammation management and neurological recovery following SCI, underscoring their promising role in future therapeutic strategies aimed at improving the quality of life of SCI patients globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40232596What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.