ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Research trends in essential thrombocythemia from 2001 to 2024: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of ET research, focusing on contributions from authors, institutions, and countries or regions, while mapping collaboration networks. Furthermore, it identifies development trends to provide insights for future research.
methodsA bibliometric analysis of ET-related publications (2001-2024) was conducted using data from the Web of Science Core Collection, focusing on publication trends, co-authorship networks, co-citation relationships, and citation bursts.
resultsA total of 4,297 studies published in 778 journals were included in the analysis. ET research has grown rapidly, with major contributions from researchers in the United States and Europe, particularly through extensive collaborations. Leading figures such as Ayalew Tefferi and Alessandro M. Vannucchi have driven advances in ET classification, molecular mechanisms, and targeted therapies. The discovery of driver mutations, such as JAK2, has revolutionized the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to ET. Research focus has shifted from clinical morphological diagnosis to molecular diagnostics, with the field now entering the era of targeted therapies. However, the heterogeneity of ET, the limitations of targeted therapies, particularly the lack of management experience and data for high-risk and special populations, as well as the incomplete understanding of the role of inflammation in the disease mechanism, continue to hinder both clinical and scientific progress in ET research.
conclusionsBibliometric analysis demonstrates significant advances in ET research, particularly in molecular pathology and targeted therapies. Future research should address ET heterogeneity, optimize management of high-risk and special populations, overcome the limitations of targeted therapies, and further elucidate the role of inflammation to achieve individualized precision therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.