ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2025
Transformer-based skeletal muscle deep-learning model for survival prediction in gastric cancer patients after curative resection.
Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Prognosis for Gastric Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Treatment With Body Composition-Based Deep Learning.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- A transformer-based prognostic signature integrating tumor and body composition CT images predicts postoperative recurrence in gastric cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Muscle-Driven prognostication in gastric cancer: A multicenter deep learning framework integrating Iliopsoas and erector spinae radiomics for 5-Year survival prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe developed and evaluated a skeletal muscle deep-learning (SMDL) model using skeletal muscle computed tomography (CT) imaging to predict the survival of patients with gastric cancer (GC).
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study included patients who underwent curative resection of GC between April 2008 and December 2020. Preoperative CT images at the third lumbar vertebra were used to develop a Transformer-based SMDL model for predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). The predictive performance of the SMDL model was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) and benchmarked against both alternative artificial intelligence models and conventional body composition parameters. The association between the model score and survival was assessed using Cox regression analysis. An integrated model combining SMDL signature with clinical variables was constructed, and its discrimination and fairness were evaluated.
resultsA total of 1242, 311, and 94 patients were assigned to the training, internal, and external validation cohorts, respectively. The Transformer-based SMDL model yielded AUCs of 0.791-0.943 for predicting RFS and DSS across all three cohorts and significantly outperformed other models and body composition parameters. The model score was a strong independent prognostic factor for survival. Incorporating the SMDL signature into the clinical model resulted in better prognostic prediction performance. The false-negative and false-positive rates of the integrated model were similar across sex and age subgroups, indicating robust fairness.
conclusionsThe Transformer-based SMDL model could accurately predict survival of GC and identify patients at high risk of recurrence or death, thereby assisting clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.