ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025
Minimal Incision Repair of Rectus Abdominis Diastasis (MIRRAD) as day-case surgery: A prospective study.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePostpartum rectus abdominis diastasis (PP-RAD) is a condition that may cause abdominal wall insufficiency, affecting daily life. When conservative treatments are unsuccessful, surgical intervention may be necessary. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of minimal incision repair of rectus abdominis diastasis (MIRRAD) as day-case surgery in women with PP-RAD.
methodsThis study included 33 female patients aged 20-50 years with PP-RAD and an inter-rectus distance (IRD) of ≥ 3 cm. All patients had previously undergone conservative treatment without satisfactory outcomes. Each patient received the MIRRAD procedure as day-case surgery apart from one who stayed overnight due to nausea. Follow-up evaluations were conducted at 4 h, 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year after surgery.
resultsThe average inter-rectus distance (IRD) was 4.4 cm, with a mean diastasis length of 15 cm. Of the 33 patients included, 2 did not attend the 1 year follow-up leaving 31 for final analysis. Of these, 30 had one or more concomitant hernias. The mean operation time was 67 min. At the 1 year follow-up, 87% of patients were satisfied with the results, and 90% said they would undergo the procedure again if necessary. No surgical site infection was reported, and recovery was generally smooth. Thirty of the 31 patients were discharged within 4 to 6 h after surgery, while one patient stayed overnight.
conclusionMIRRAD appears to be a safe and effective surgical option for PP-RAD, particularly in cases without significant excess skin. Further studies with larger populations and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings and establish standard patient selection criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.