Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40232544›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2025

Do Targeted Interventions Diminish Victimization? Testing the Short- and Longer-term Effectiveness of Condemning, Empathy-Raising, and Combined Approaches.

Lydia Laninga-Wijnen, Mark Huisman, Daniel Graf, Christina Salmivalli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How Adherence to an Evidence-Based Targeted Intervention Procedure is Related to Intervention Effectiveness?Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  2. The role of defenders' and victims' popularity in the effectiveness of defending in bullying interactions: A longitudinal social network study.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lydia Laninga-WijnenINVEST/Psychology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. lalawi@utu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6158-8950
Mark HuismanStatistics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Daniel GrafINVEST/Psychology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Christina SalmivalliINVEST/Psychology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Funding

Academy of Finland 349560European Research Council 884434Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 019.211SG.003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the detrimental effects of school bullying, it is essential that teachers are provided with effective guidelines on how to implement targeted interventions if a case of bullying comes to their attention. Yet to date, most research has focused on how bullying can be prevented, rather than how it should be intervened upon. To address this gap, the current study compared the short- and longer-term development of victimization of students whose bullies were enrolled in a targeted intervention, and compared three approaches taken in such interventions when talking to perpetrators: (1) promoting empathy for victims among bullies, (2) explicitly condemning bullying behaviors, and (3) a combination of these approaches. The sample consisted of n = 274 victims from primary and secondary schools (56.6% female, Mage = 11.95, SD = 1.89). School personnel used a mobile application KiVappi to document the steps they took when implementing targeted interventions on bullying perpetrators of these victims (including a follow up meeting in which victims were asked about the short-term effectiveness of the intervention). Most cases were handled with an empathy-raising approach (n = 117), followed by the condemning (n = 113) and combined (n = 44) approach. Targeted intervention data was matched to survey data collected to examine longer-term changes in self-reported victimization. The results indicate that the success rates of targeted interventions on the short-term were promising: 88.2% of the victims indicated that the victimization had decreased or ceased, and the combined approach seemed to be the "best bet". In the longer term, victims whose bullies were enrolled in a targeted intervention were equally stable in self-reported victimization as the control group - irrespective of the approach taken in the targeted intervention. Thus, despite potential short-term successes, targeted interventions may not be enough to help victims of bullying escape their plight in the longer term.

Indexed as

BullyingCrime VictimsEmpathyStudentsAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleSchoolsBullying victimizationCondemningEmpathyTargeted interventionsTeachers

Identifiers

PMID40232544
PMCPMC12246010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.