ReviewMetabolic brain disease2025
Hepatic encephalopathy as an indication or contraindication to liver transplant?
Review in Metabolic brain disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reducing the Risk of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy Recurrence: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) presents a significant challenge in liver transplantation (LT). On the one hand, LT can provide a curative treatment for HE by addressing its underlying cause, suggesting HE should be a strong indication for LT. Conversely, the severity of HE may reflect advanced liver disease and significant neurocognitive impairment, potentially complicating post-transplant outcomes and raising concerns about its suitability as an indication. This review will provide helpful insight to the hepatologist deciding whether HE should be considered an indication or a contraindication to liver transplantation in their patient. It gives an overview of the burden of HE pretransplant, HE's current status in the transplant listing process, and pre- and post-transplant cognitive issues to be mindful of. The main take-away messages are that pre-transplant HE should be managed aggressively, that neurodegenerative disorders and other differential diagnoses to HE should be thoroughly excluded, and that immunosuppressants can cause new onset cognitive issues post-transplant and should be monitored closely. In the future, objective measures of HE severity should be included in the MELD score to enhance the fairness and efficacy of transplant listings, ensuring those with cirrhosis complicated by HE receive timely and appropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.