Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40232521›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025

The British object and action naming test for intraoperative mapping (BOATIM): A standardised and clinically tested framework for awake brain surgery.

Hajira Mumtaz, Anna E Piasecki, Minna Kirjavainen, Margaret Newson, Madeleine Farrow, Molly Cree, Neil U Barua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hajira MumtazSouthmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2440-1883
Anna E PiaseckiSouthmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK. Anna.Piasecki@uwe.ac.uk.ORCID 0009-0008-3975-0323
Minna KirjavainenCollege of Arts, Technology, and Environment, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6646-1860
Margaret NewsonSouthmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0697-0978
Madeleine FarrowSouthmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-8924-7274
Molly CreeSouthmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-3603-2211
Neil U BaruaSouthmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8348-5354

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPicture-naming tasks are widely used for identifying speech-eloquent regions during awake craniotomy. However, language-specific and culturally relevant task stimuli remain scarce. Current practices mostly rely on translated stimuli that do not reflect the everyday language use of the target speakers and might be susceptible to misinterpretations due to linguistic and cultural differences. Additionally, non-standardised homemade tasks are used. Here, we, for the first time, present the development, standardisation, and clinical application of two tests designed specifically for functional mapping in British English.

methods115 object and 86 action stimuli were developed using the British National Corpus (BNC) and controlled for confounding psycholinguistic variables using normative data from native speakers. Optimization of the items for intraoperative use was done by first standardising the tests in healthy volunteers followed by their application during the electrical stimulation of language-eloquent regions in brain tumour patients. In the standardised data, the influence of word- and subject-related factors on performance, and the test-retest reliability was explored.

resultsThe final items achieved above 80% naming agreement. Object naming proved easier compared to action naming, with accuracy positively influenced by word frequency and negatively affected by the age-of-acquisition variable in both tasks. No subject-related effects were found. Excellent test-retest reliability confirmed the consistency of the tests in measuring language abilities. Positive maps obtained during intraoperative functional mapping demonstrated the sensitivity of the tests in detecting speech-eloquent regions.

conclusionThe tests provide a reliable and robust tool containing stimuli that are linguistically and culturally appropriate to British-English speakers.

Indexed as

Brain MappingBrain NeoplasmsIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringAdultAgedCraniotomyFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsReproducibility of ResultsWakefulnessYoung AdultAwake craniotomyIntraoperativeLanguage mappingPicture namingPost-operativePre-operative

Identifiers

PMID40232521
PMCPMC12000273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.