Observational studyWorld journal of urology2025
Endoscopic treatment of renal and ureteral stones using the new Cyber Ho generator with Magneto technology: the first clinical experience from a multicenter study.
Observational study in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- An in-vitro comparative study of magneto holmium: YAG and fiber dust thulium fiber lasers-primary effects on ablation, retropulsion, fragmentation, and temperature changes using phantom urologic stones.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma with laser ablation including Magneto pulse modulation.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Magneto Ho:YAG laser versus Thulium Fiber Laser for laser lithotripsy during flexible ureteroscopy with a flexible and navigable ureteral access sheath.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- The Effect of Conventional Ho:YAG, Magneto Ho:YAG and Thulium Fiber Laser on Soft Tissue: An Ex Vivo Comparative Study in Porcine Kidney.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Old versus new tools to reduce retropulsion of proximal ureteral stones: virtual basket versus Magneto technology pulse modulation, which is the most effective?World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Which is the best laser for ureteroscopy? A Comprehensive Review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA novel Ho: YAG laser generator incorporating Magneto pulse modulation technology has been developed to enhance lithotripsy performance. This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the Holmium: YAG Cyber Ho generator with Magneto technology (Quanta System MATERIALS AND
methodsAn observational multicentric study was conducted on 55 prospectively enrolled patients with ureteral and renal stones who underwent endoscopic lithotripsy using the new Ho: YAG laser with Magneto pulse modulation technology. Recorded parameters included stone volume, density, laser-on time (LOT), and laser settings optimized for Magneto use. Outcome metrics included ablation speed (mm³/s) and energy consumption (J/mm³), while the stone-free rate (SFR) and complication rate were also assessed. The perceived effectiveness of lithotripsy and retropulsion were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale.
resultsIncluded patients had a median age of 57 years (IQR 48-65). The median stone volume was 948 mm³ (IQR 107-3091), and the median stone density was 900 HU (IQR 750-1105). Stones were located in the ureter in 21 cases (38%), in the lower calyx in 13 cases (24%), and in the upper/mid calyx in 21 cases (38%). The median laser-on time was 16 min (IQR 5-17). Laser settings showed consistent performance, with a median energy of 0.8 J (IQR 0.8-0.8), a frequency of 10 Hz (IQR 10-10), and an average power of 8 W (IQR 8-10). Lithotripsy performance was reflected by a median energy consumption of 14.8 J/mm³ (IQR 11.9-24.3) and an ablation speed of 0.6 mm³/s (IQR 0.4-0.7). The stone-free rate (SFR) was 94.5%. 3.6% of patients experienced Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2 complications, and no severe complications (grade 3-4) were reported. Subjective efficacy was rated as "outstanding" and "very good" in 58.2% and 36.4% of cases, respectively, while retropulsion was subjectively evaluated as "absent" and "very low" in 91.0% and 9.0% of cases, respectively.
conclusionsEndoscopic treatment of renal and ureteral stones using the Cyber Ho generator with the new Magneto pulse modulation technology is safe and effective in this preliminary report. High ablation efficiency and a satisfying anti-retropulsion effect have been reported, potentially leading to faster treatment, higher stone-free rates (SFR), and a lower need for second-stage procedures. Further studies are required to fully evaluate this technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40232519What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.