Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40232519›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of urology2025

Endoscopic treatment of renal and ureteral stones using the new Cyber Ho generator with Magneto technology: the first clinical experience from a multicenter study.

Davide Perri, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Umberto Besana, Federica Mazzoleni, Andrea Pacchetti, Tommaso Calcagnile, Luca Villa, Andrea Folcia, Andrea Salonia, Stefano Moretto and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Which is the best laser for ureteroscopy? A Comprehensive Review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Davide PerriDivision of Urology, ASST Lariana, Sant'Anna Hospital, Via Ravona 20, San Fermo della Battaglia, 22042, Como, Italy. perri.davide90@gmail.com.
Eugenio VentimigliaDivision of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Umberto BesanaDivision of Urology, ASST Lariana, Sant'Anna Hospital, Via Ravona 20, San Fermo della Battaglia, 22042, Como, Italy.
Federica MazzoleniDivision of Urology, ASST Lariana, Sant'Anna Hospital, Via Ravona 20, San Fermo della Battaglia, 22042, Como, Italy.
Andrea PacchettiDivision of Urology, ASST Lariana, Sant'Anna Hospital, Via Ravona 20, San Fermo della Battaglia, 22042, Como, Italy.
Tommaso CalcagnileDivision of Urology, ASST Lariana, Sant'Anna Hospital, Via Ravona 20, San Fermo della Battaglia, 22042, Como, Italy.
Luca VillaDivision of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Andrea FolciaDivision of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Andrea SaloniaDivision of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Stefano MorettoDivision of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Aideen MaddenDivision of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Giorgio BozziniDivision of Urology, ASST Lariana, Sant'Anna Hospital, Via Ravona 20, San Fermo della Battaglia, 22042, Como, Italy.
Olivier TraxerDivision of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA novel Ho: YAG laser generator incorporating Magneto pulse modulation technology has been developed to enhance lithotripsy performance. This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the Holmium: YAG Cyber Ho generator with Magneto technology (Quanta System MATERIALS AND

methodsAn observational multicentric study was conducted on 55 prospectively enrolled patients with ureteral and renal stones who underwent endoscopic lithotripsy using the new Ho: YAG laser with Magneto pulse modulation technology. Recorded parameters included stone volume, density, laser-on time (LOT), and laser settings optimized for Magneto use. Outcome metrics included ablation speed (mm³/s) and energy consumption (J/mm³), while the stone-free rate (SFR) and complication rate were also assessed. The perceived effectiveness of lithotripsy and retropulsion were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale.

resultsIncluded patients had a median age of 57 years (IQR 48-65). The median stone volume was 948 mm³ (IQR 107-3091), and the median stone density was 900 HU (IQR 750-1105). Stones were located in the ureter in 21 cases (38%), in the lower calyx in 13 cases (24%), and in the upper/mid calyx in 21 cases (38%). The median laser-on time was 16 min (IQR 5-17). Laser settings showed consistent performance, with a median energy of 0.8 J (IQR 0.8-0.8), a frequency of 10 Hz (IQR 10-10), and an average power of 8 W (IQR 8-10). Lithotripsy performance was reflected by a median energy consumption of 14.8 J/mm³ (IQR 11.9-24.3) and an ablation speed of 0.6 mm³/s (IQR 0.4-0.7). The stone-free rate (SFR) was 94.5%. 3.6% of patients experienced Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2 complications, and no severe complications (grade 3-4) were reported. Subjective efficacy was rated as "outstanding" and "very good" in 58.2% and 36.4% of cases, respectively, while retropulsion was subjectively evaluated as "absent" and "very low" in 91.0% and 9.0% of cases, respectively.

conclusionsEndoscopic treatment of renal and ureteral stones using the Cyber Ho generator with the new Magneto pulse modulation technology is safe and effective in this preliminary report. High ablation efficiency and a satisfying anti-retropulsion effect have been reported, potentially leading to faster treatment, higher stone-free rates (SFR), and a lower need for second-stage procedures. Further studies are required to fully evaluate this technology.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiLasers, Solid-StateLithotripsy, LaserUreteral CalculiUreteroscopyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHolmium:YAGMagnetoPeak powerRenal stoneRIRS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.