ArticlePsychological research2025
The effect of preparation on binding between spatial and non-spatial features of voices in a multitalker setting.
Article in Psychological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dynamic switching of attention between voices in multitalker situations is often investigated in paradigms that combine selective listening with 'attention switching'. Participants are presented concurrently with two talkers, a female and a male, and asked to respond to the number spoken by the talker specified on each trial by a cue. A change in the target voice (when compared to listening to the same voice) results in a robust performance 'switch cost'- which can be reduced substantially by increasing the preparation (cue-stimulus) interval. Using dichotic presentation we asked whether preparation also increases the selectivity for the cued (relevant) voice dimension- gender (in one session) or location (in another session). We examined the interaction between the features of the relevant dimension and features of the irrelevant dimension (which varied independently) as a function of preparation. When the two voices (genders) were heard from the same locations as on the preceding trial, performance was better than when genders swapped locations relative to the previous trial- suggesting 'binding' between genders and locations. The key question was whether preparation reduced this binding effect- which would indicate greater dimensional selectivity. We found the opposite- the binding effect was significantly larger when there was more time for preparation. Since preparation reduced the switch cost but increased the binding effect, the results reveal a dissociation between the effect of preparation on the switch cost and on the binding effect. We propose mechanisms by which preparation may enhance the formation of bindings and/or their retrieval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.