Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40232516›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2025

The effect of preparation on binding between spatial and non-spatial features of voices in a multitalker setting.

Amy Strivens, Aureliu Lavric, Elena Benini, Andrea M Philipp, Iring Koch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy StrivensInstitute for Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. amy.strivens@psych.rwth-aachen.de.
Aureliu LavricDepartment of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Elena BeniniInstitute for Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Andrea M PhilippInstitute for Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Iring KochInstitute for Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic switching of attention between voices in multitalker situations is often investigated in paradigms that combine selective listening with 'attention switching'. Participants are presented concurrently with two talkers, a female and a male, and asked to respond to the number spoken by the talker specified on each trial by a cue. A change in the target voice (when compared to listening to the same voice) results in a robust performance 'switch cost'- which can be reduced substantially by increasing the preparation (cue-stimulus) interval. Using dichotic presentation we asked whether preparation also increases the selectivity for the cued (relevant) voice dimension- gender (in one session) or location (in another session). We examined the interaction between the features of the relevant dimension and features of the irrelevant dimension (which varied independently) as a function of preparation. When the two voices (genders) were heard from the same locations as on the preceding trial, performance was better than when genders swapped locations relative to the previous trial- suggesting 'binding' between genders and locations. The key question was whether preparation reduced this binding effect- which would indicate greater dimensional selectivity. We found the opposite- the binding effect was significantly larger when there was more time for preparation. Since preparation reduced the switch cost but increased the binding effect, the results reveal a dissociation between the effect of preparation on the switch cost and on the binding effect. We propose mechanisms by which preparation may enhance the formation of bindings and/or their retrieval.

Indexed as

AttentionAuditory PerceptionSpace PerceptionSpeech PerceptionVoiceAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40232516
PMCPMC12000195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.