Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40232366›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Utility of the psychache scale in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar disease: a prospective single-center study.

Salim Yakdan, Braeden Benedict, Saad Javeed, Justin K Zhang, Miguel A Ruiz-Cardozo, Michael P Kelly, Brian Neuman, Burel R Goodin, Wilson Z Ray, Thomas L Rodebaugh and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Salim YakdanWashington University in St. Louis, St Louis, USA. salimy@wustl.edu.
Braeden BenedictWashington University in St. Louis, St Louis, USA.
Saad JaveedWashington University in St. Louis, St Louis, USA.
Justin K ZhangUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Miguel A Ruiz-CardozoWashington University in St. Louis, St Louis, USA.
Michael P KellyRady Children's Hospital,University of California, San Diego, USA.
Brian NeumanWashington University in St. Louis, St Louis, USA.
Burel R GoodinWashington University in St. Louis, St Louis, USA.
Wilson Z RayWashington University in St. Louis, St Louis, USA.
Thomas L RodebaughUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Jacob K GreenbergWashington University in St. Louis, St Louis, USA.
Madelyn R FrumkinWashington University in St. Louis, St Louis, USA.

Funding

NIMH NIH HHS 1F31MH124291-01A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to psychometrically validate the Psychache Scale (PAS) and investigate its prognostic value in predicting postoperative outcomes.

methodsThis is a prospective single-center study. Adults undergoing lumbar or thoracolumbar surgery were recruited. Participants completed PAS preoperatively and patient-reported outcome measures evaluating mental health, pain, physical function, and disability preoperatively and at one and six months postoperatively. PAS internal consistency was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and factor structure was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was assessed by examining correlations between PAS and measures of mental and physical health. PAS prognostic utility was evaluated by assessing its association with short- and longer-term surgical outcomes.

resultsWe included 166 patients. Mean (SD) age was 59.7 (12) years, with 55% females. PAS reliability was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95), and factor analysis confirmed the hypothesized one-factor structure. PAS showed strong correlations with PHQ-9 (r = 0.64), PROMIS anxiety (r = 0.64), pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) (r = 0.7), and its helplessness (r = 0.72), magnification (r = 0.59), and rumination (r = 0.59) subscales. However, it shows weak to moderate correlations with non-mental health-related metrics (0.07 < r < 0.44). Preoperative PAS was moderately correlated with one-month pain interference, and six-month PHQ-9 and PROMIS anxiety scores. In predicting outcomes, the addition of PAS to models including baseline values improved the prediction of all outcomes except for PROMIS physical function.

conclusionsOur study suggests PAS may be a valuable tool for assessing psychological distress in this patient population. Further research is needed to understand its relevance in spine surgery practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DegenerationLumbar VertebraeAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsDegenerative spine diseaseDepressionMental healthPsychache scaleSpine surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.