Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40232356›Full record

ArticleLifetime data analysis2025

Robust inverse probability weighted estimators for doubly truncated Cox regression with closed-form standard errors.

Omar Vazquez, Sharon X Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lifetime data analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Omar VazquezDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-4137-3333
Sharon X XieDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. sxie@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7886-4103

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG072979 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Corey T McMillan · 2021 to 2026
$24.8M
Understanding Environmental Contributions to Heterogeneity in bvFTD.P01AG066597 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI David John Irwin, Corey T McMillan · 2020 to 2026
$18.8M
Project IV "Tackling Heterogeneity of Cognitive Trajectory in LBD"U19AG062418 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TROJANOWSKI, JOHN Q. · 2019 to 2023
$18.1M
Project IV: In Vivo Dissection of Genetic Modifiers on Different Stages of SynucleinopathyP01AG084497 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DANIEL WEINTRAUB · 2024 to 2026
$15.2M
Cross-disciplinary training in translational neuroimaging of ADRDT32AG076411 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JOHN A DETRE, MURRAY GROSSMAN · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
Efficient statistical methods for assessing dementia risk in Parkinson's diseaseR01NS102324 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WEINTRAUB, DANIEL, XIE, SHARON XIANGWEN · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG066597NIA NIH HHS P01 AG084497NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072979NIA NIH HHS P30-AG072979, P01-AG066597, U19-AG062418, and P01-AG084497NIA NIH HHS T32 AG076411NIA NIH HHS U19 AG062418NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102324NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS102324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival data is doubly truncated when only participants who experience an event during a random interval are included in the sample. Existing methods typically correct for double truncation bias in Cox regression through inverse probability weighting via the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimate (NPMLE) of the selection probabilities. This approach relies on two key assumptions, quasi-independent truncation and positivity of the sampling probabilities, yet there are no methods available to thoroughly assess these assumptions in the regression context. Furthermore, these estimators can be particularly sensitive to extreme event times. Finally, current double truncation methods rely on bootstrapping for variance estimation. Aside from the unnecessary computational burden, there are often identifiability issues with the NPMLE during bootstrap resampling. To address these limitations of current methods, we propose a class of robust Cox regression coefficient estimators with time-varying inverse probability weights and extend these estimators to conduct sensitivity analysis regarding possible non-positivity of the sampling probabilities. Also, we develop a nonparametric test and graphical diagnostic for verifying the quasi-independent truncation assumption. Finally, we provide closed-form standard errors for the NPMLE as well as for the proposed estimators. The proposed estimators are evaluated through extensive simulations and illustrated using an AIDS study.

Indexed as

Proportional Hazards ModelsBiasComputer SimulationLikelihood FunctionsProbabilitySurvival AnalysisAIDSCox modeldouble truncationrobust inference

Identifiers

PMID40232356
PMCPMC12043752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.