ArticleInsights into imaging2025
Classification and segmentation of hip fractures in x-rays: highlighting fracture regions for interpretable diagnosis.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence for facial fracture detection: a systematic review.Oral radiology · 2026Pooled it
- AI-based Hip Fracture Classification from Pelvic X-ray Images Using a Hybrid PEFT-ViT and XGBoost Model.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Performance, Heterogeneity, and Methodological Quality of YOLO-Based Models for Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Enhanced YOLOv8 with Hybrid Attention Gating Block for Intertrochanteric Fracture Detection in Complex X-Ray Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Trochanteric region fracture classification network (TRFC-net): a deep learning solution to increasing inexperienced residents' trochanteric region fracture classification accuracy on X-rays.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Improved YOLOv8 with average pooling downsampling for detection and classification of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in X-ray images: a study focusing on AO/OTA classification.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Garden classification of femoral neck fracture using deep-learning algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedics: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system capable of classifying and segmenting femoral fractures. To compare its performance against existing state-of-the-art methods.
methodsThis Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved retrospective study did not require informed consent. 10,308 hip x-rays from 2618 patients were retrieved from the hospital PACS. 986 were randomly selected for annotation and randomly split into training, validation, and test sets at the patient level. Two radiologists segmented and classified femoral fractures based on their location (femoral neck, pertrochanteric region, or subtrochanteric region) and grade, using the Evans and Garden scales for neck and pertrochanteric regions, respectively. A YOLOv8 segmentation convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained to generate fracture masks and indicate their class and grade. Classification CNNs were trained in the same dataset for method comparison.
resultsOn the test set, YOLOv8 achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.56-0.98) for segmenting fractures, an accuracy of 86.2% (95% CI: 80.77-90.55) for classification and grading, and an AUC of 0.981 (95% CI: 0.965-0.997) for fracture detection. These metrics are on par with or exceed those of previously published AI methods, demonstrating the efficacy of our approach.
conclusionsThe high accuracy and AUC values demonstrate the potential of the proposed neural network as a reliable tool in clinical settings. Further, it is the first to provide a precise segmentation of femoral fractures, as indicated by the Dice scores, which may enhance interpretability. A formal evaluation is planned to further assess its clinical applicability. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The proposed system offers high granularity in fracture classification and is the first to segment femoral fractures, ensuring interpretability. KEY POINTS: We present the first AI method that segments and grades femoral fractures. The method classifies fractures with fracture location and type. High accuracy and interpretability promise utility in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.