ReviewCA: a cancer journal for clinicians
Management of T-cell malignancies: Bench-to-bedside targeting of epigenetic biology.
Review in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are CHOP-plus really CHOP-minus propositions in the treatment of PTCL? A comprehensive assessment of the strategy.Blood advances · 2026Review
- Targeting signaling pathways in lymphoma: From molecular mechanisms to clinical breakthroughs.Chinese medical journal · 2026Review
- Divergent molecular pathways drive monomorphic epitheliotropic and enteropathy-associated intestinal T-cell lymphoma.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Nodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma with Prominent Expansion of PD-1+ T-Follicular Helper Cells: A Persistent Diagnostic Challenge with a Heterogeneous Mutational Architecture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Epigenetic pharmacology in aging: from mechanisms to therapies for age-related disorders.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are the only disease for which four histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have been approved globally as single agents. Although it is not clear why the PTCL exhibit such a vulnerability to these drugs, understanding the biological basis for this activity is essential. Many lines of data have established that the PTCL exhibit marked sensitivity to other epigenetically targeted drugs, including EZH2 and DNMT3 (DNA-methyltransferase 3) inhibitors. Even more compelling is the finding that combinations of drugs targeting the epigenetic biology of PTCL are beginning to produce provocative data, leading some to wonder if these agents can replace historical chemotherapy regimens routinely used for patients with the disease. Simultaneously, the field has identified a spectrum of mutations in genes governing epigenetic biology in many subtypes of PTCL, although the T follicular helper lymphomas, including angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, appear to be particularly enriched for these genetic features. While the direct relationship between the presence of any one of these mutations and responsiveness to a particular epigenetic drug has yet to be established, it is increasingly accepted that the PTCL may be the prototypical epigenetic disease as no other form of cancer has exhibited such a vulnerability to this diversity of epigenetically targeted agents. Herein, we comprehensively review this esoteric and rapidly evolving field to identify themes and lessons from these experiences that may guide efforts to improve outcomes of patients with T-cell neoplasms. Furthermore, we will discuss how these concepts might be applied to the broader field of cancer medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.