ArticleScience progress
Virome capture sequencing for comprehensive HPV genotyping in cervical samples.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomarkers for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and the role of HPV: Multi‑omics approaches and current evidence (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aims to explore HPV genotyping in the cervical specimen using VirCapSeq by comparing the results with the reverse blot hybridization assay (REBA).MethodsA secondary cross-sectional data of HPV genotypes in 35 cervical specimens was obtained from VirCapSeq and REBA methods. The .FASTQ files were downloaded from the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) (accession number PRJNA766412) and HPV genotyping was bioinformatically analyzed by mapping the sequences to the PaVE database. HPV genotypes detected by REBA and NGS were compared. All specimens were stratified by histology into cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 1 (CIN1) and 2/3 (CIN2/3).ResultsNGS via VirCapSeq detected HPV DNA in 100% of the samples, whereas the REBA (hybridization-based) assay diagnosed HPV DNA in 85.71%. While the limitation of the conventional methods for HPV genotyping is the use of primers or probes, NGS detected a broader range. The results showed that mixed infections were detected in all samples by NGS, with HPV16 and HPV52 being the most abundant genotypes.ConclusionsHPV genome abundance, coverage, and diversity were associated with detection discrepancies between the methods, highlighting the enhanced sensitivity and diagnostic capabilities of NGS. These findings underscore the potential of NGS technologies for comprehensive HPV genotyping, advancing cervical cancer screening, and epidemiological studies. Future research should address cost barriers and expand cohort sizes to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.