ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the foot Health Status Questionnaire in patients with plantar pain: evaluation of test-retest.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) is a foot health psychometric tool for measuring foot health status that consists of eight dimensions. Currently, the FHSQ has been adapted to several languages. It was considered necessary to translate and adapt the FHSQ to the Persian language. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the repeatability and reliability of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) translated into Persian.
methodThe translation into Persian and test-retest reliability methods came from the English version of the questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed to 88 individuals diagnosed with plantar heel pain, who were recruited from a podiatry clinic in Iran. To assess test-retest reliability, the instrument was administered on two separate occasions, with a five-day interval between the initial and follow-up assessments.
resultsAs regards the total mark for each dimension, internal consistency and reliability were determined with the Cronbach
conclusionsThe Persian version of the FHSQ was shown to be a valid and reliable tool for acceptable use in the Iran population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.