Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40232110›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Analysis of Public Policies on Food Security for Older Mapuche Adults in Rural Areas.

Angélica Hernández-Moreno, Fernanda Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Natalia Celedón-Celis, María Girona-Gamarra, Jorge Hochstetter-Diez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angélica Hernández-MorenoDepartamento de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-3654-2202
Fernanda Gutiérrez-GutiérrezDepartamento de Ciencias de la Computación e Informática, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile.ORCID 0009-0001-8564-3501
Natalia Celedón-CelisDepartamento de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-9307-4380
María Girona-GamarraDepartamento de Nutrición Básica, Escuela de Nutrición, Universidad de la República, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0003-4103-0655
Jorge Hochstetter-DiezDepartamento de Ciencias de la Computación e Informática, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-8494-8100

Funding

CSP VA 2000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food security remains a critical challenge for older adults in rural Indigenous communities, particularly among the Mapuche people. This study presents an analysis of public policies that address the food security of Mapuche older adults in rural Chile. Using an interpretative qualitative approach, we explore the alignment between government programs and the lived experiences of this population. Findings indicate that existing policies lack cultural pertinence, focusing primarily on market-driven agricultural production rather than self-sufficiency and traditional food systems. Participants highlight the loss of community farming practices, environmental degradation, and the imposition of external production models as key factors exacerbating food insecurity. In addition, health and education policies do not integrate Indigenous knowledge and food habits, which further limits their effectiveness. This study highlights the need for culturally inclusive public policies that support local food sovereignty, sustainable agricultural practices, and the empowerment of Indigenous communities.

Indexed as

ethnographic analysisfood securityindigenous communitiesMapucheolder adultspublic policies

Identifiers

PMID40232110
PMCPMC11942188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.