ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Exploring College Students' Acceptance of and Behavioral Intentions Toward Different Sorghum-Based Foods.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping Knowledge Gaps: A Needs Assessment of Sorghum, Whole Grains Knowledge and Prediabetes Risk.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Consumer Interest in Alternative Grains, Especially Sorghum: A Qualitative Investigation.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sorghum is a nutritious, healthy, gluten-free whole grain, with the United States (U.S.) leading its production globally. While sorghum is consumed worldwide, it is mainly used for animal feed and biofuel in the U.S. Organoleptic characteristics and consumers' perceptions determine food acceptance and eating behavior. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the acceptance of and eating and purchase intentions toward sorghum-based foods among college students in a southern university in the U.S. Eighty-three students participated in a series of sensory evaluations using two sets of four sorghum samples each and a 15 min break. Seven sensory attributes were evaluated with a nine-point hedonic scale, and a five-point scale was used for eating and purchase intentions. To assess the panelists' acceptance, the overall acceptance scale score (range: 1-9) was normalized (range: 0-100) and used for analyses. Spiced sorghum cookies (77.95 ± 14.23) had the highest acceptance, followed by sorghum shrimp grits (74.51 ± 19.42). Overall acceptance, eating intention, and purchase intention were strongly associated across all food items, although the strength differed by food type. Sorghum-based foods were accepted despite the participants' lack of exposure to sorghum and its null consumption. These outcomes will help to develop innovative sorghum-based foods to facilitate sorghum consumption and benefit consumer health in the U.S.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.