ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy vs. Fluorescence Spectroscopy for Olive Oil Authentication.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the present work, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) and fluorescence spectroscopy are used and assessed for the detection of EVOOs' adulteration with some non-EVOO edible oils (i.e., pomace, corn, sunflower, and soybean) and the discrimination of EVOOs based on geographical origin. For the direct comparison of the performance of the two techniques, the same set of EVOO samples was studied. The acquired spectroscopic data were analyzed by several machine learning algorithms, and the constructed predictive models are evaluated thoroughly for their reliability and robustness. In all cases, the high classification accuracies obtained support the potential and efficiency of both LIBS and fluorescence spectroscopy for the rapid, online, and in situ study of EVOOs' authentication issues, with LIBS being more advantageous as it operates much faster.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.