Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40232007›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Food Allergen Quantitative Risk Assessment at a Crossroads: A Critical Evaluation of Laboratory Performance for Quantifying Total Egg and Milk Protein in Cookies.

Elena Cubero-Leon, Jørgen Nørgaard, Pieter Dehouck, Piotr Robouch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elena Cubero-LeonEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 2440 Geel, Belgium.
Jørgen NørgaardEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 2440 Geel, Belgium.
Pieter DehouckEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 2440 Geel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8069-4062
Piotr RobouchEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 2440 Geel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0235-9928

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate quantification of food allergens is crucial for ensuring consumer safety and compliance with regulatory requirements. A proficiency test (PT) was organised to evaluate the performance of laboratories in quantifying total egg and total milk protein in cookies. The PT involved 20 laboratories, which reported results using mainly commercial ELISA kits and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The findings indicate a satisfactory performance for milk protein determination among the majority of participant laboratories. However, the quantification of egg proteins in heated products remains a challenge, with most laboratories reporting results significantly below the reference value. Several potential factors contributing to this challenge are discussed, including the denaturation of egg proteins during heat treatment, differences in extraction strategies and the antibodies used in ELISA kits, and the lack of standardised methods and conversion factors for LC-MS/MS analysis. These findings underscore the importance of regular PT exercises to evaluate laboratory performance and ensure compliance with WHO/FAO recommendations. The results of this study aim to guide the development of improved analytical methods and strategies for ensuring the accurate quantification of food allergens.

Indexed as

allergensegg proteinimmunoassaysmilk proteinproficiency testingquantitative risk assessmenttotal protein content

Identifiers

PMID40232007
PMCPMC11941581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.