Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40231954›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Impact of Dehydration Processing on Scallop (

Huaqiong Li, Yulong Zhao, Jian Shi, Manat Chaijan, Xichang Wang, Mingyu Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Huaqiong LiCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Yulong ZhaoCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Jian ShiCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Manat ChaijanFood Technology and Innovation Research Center of Excellence, School of Agricultural Technology and Food Industry, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3839-8942
Xichang WangCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Mingyu YinCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.

Funding

Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF GZC20231540Shanghai Super Postdoctoral Program 2023336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of four drying techniques-hot air drying (HAD), vacuum hot air drying (VFAD), microwave drying (MWD), and vacuum freeze-drying (VFD)-on the structural, physicochemical, and functional properties of scallop adductor muscles, a critical marine resource in the food industry. The results demonstrated that VFD optimally preserved the ultrastructural integrity of the tissue, maintaining its surface fibrous architecture and achieving a superior recovery ration (78%) and rehydration ration (186.5%) compared to HAD, VFAD, and MWD. While the zeta potential remained statistically invariant across methods, HAD induced the largest particle agglomeration, followed by MWD. Notably, VFD enhanced protein stability, increasing the sulfhydryl content by 163.2% and reducing carbonyl formation by 48.1% relative to HAD, whereas MWD had the opposite effect. Multispectral analyses revealed the severe disruption of protein secondary and tertiary structures after MWD, while VFD minimized conformational denaturation. Statistical modeling ranked the drying sensitivity parameters as follows: surface hydrophobicity > hardness> β-turn content > dityrosine crosslinking > transverse relaxation time T23. These findings underscore VFD as the optimal method for mitigating structural degradation and oxidative damage in scallop processing, providing actionable insights to enhance the technofunctional quality of shelf-stable scallop products.

Indexed as

drying processprotein oxidationscallop (Patinopecten yessoensis)seafood qualitystructural changes

Identifiers

PMID40231954
PMCPMC11941159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.