ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Seafood Labeling in Croatia: Molecular Evidence and Regulatory Insights.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of Species-Specific Peptide Markers in Highly Processed Meat Products Using De Novo Sequencing.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fisheries and aquaculture play a crucial role in global food security, yet species mislabeling remains a persistent challenge, undermining consumer trust and market transparency. Proper food labeling is essential for protecting public health due to the presence of unknown toxic or allergenic substances and preventing illegally sourced products from entering the market. Despite extensive research across Europe, seafood mislabeling in Croatia has remained unexplored. This study aims to provide the first comprehensive assessment of seafood labeling accuracy in Croatia, where fisheries are integral to the coastal economies and tourism. Using DNA barcoding of the COI gene, 109 seafood samples were collected over two years from various sources, including restaurants, markets, and fishing vessels, and analyzed for potential mislabeling. Results revealed a mislabeling rate of 3% among fish samples and 20% among cephalopods, with notable substitutions, such as the yellowfin tuna mislabeled as bigeye tuna and Bluefin tuna and the European squid mislabeled as Patagonian squid. Additionally, 38.5% of samples were partially labeled, while 32% lacked clear country-of-origin information, complicating traceability. While the findings align with the mislabeling rates in other European countries, this study underscores the ongoing challenges in seafood labeling compliance. Establishing standardized monitoring protocols will be essential for improving comparability and effectively addressing seafood fraud.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.