Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40231839›Full record

ArticlePhysiologia plantarum

Root restriction accelerates genomic target identification in quinoa under controlled conditions.

Davide Visintainer, Nanna Fjord Sørensen, Mengming Chen, Mai Duy Luu Trinh, Rute R da Fonseca, Sara Fondevilla, Rosa L López-Marqués

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiologia plantarum. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Davide VisintainerCopenhagen Plant Science Center, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4681-4643
Nanna Fjord SørensenCopenhagen Plant Science Center, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Mengming ChenCopenhagen Plant Science Center, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9086-6910
Mai Duy Luu TrinhCopenhagen Plant Science Center, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3428-3657
Rute R da FonsecaCenter for Global Mountain Biodiversity, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2805-4698
Sara FondevillaInstituto de Agricultura Sostenible, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n, Alameda del Obispo Campus, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Córdoba, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0682-8135
Rosa L López-MarquésCopenhagen Plant Science Center, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5663-7903

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 801199Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF19OC0056580/NovoCrops
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) is a nutritious and resilient crop that displays a high genetic and phenotypic variation. As the popularity of this crop increases, there is a growing need to integrate classic and modern breeding tools to favor its improvement. We tested root restriction as a method to reduce plant size and enable high-throughput phenotypic screening of large sets of quinoa plants under controlled conditions. We verified how increasing root restriction does not affect the prediction of field behavior with respect to other standard greenhouse cultivation procedures. We then combined the phenotypic information obtained with our root restriction system with whole-genome re-sequencing data to characterize a quinoa diversity panel of 100 accessions and showed that phenotypic data obtained from root-restricted plants provide real insights into quinoa genetics. Finally, we carried out a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and identified a previously described locus for betalain biosynthesis, as well as other candidate loci linked to betalain biosynthesis and seed size. Overall, we showed that a phenotyping system based on root restriction can aid the identification of genomic targets in quinoa, which can complement and inform field trials for certain traits. This work supports further breeding and faster improvement of quinoa.

Indexed as

Chenopodium quinoaGenome, PlantPlant RootsGenome-Wide Association StudyPhenotypePlant BreedingSeeds

Identifiers

PMID40231839
PMCPMC11998636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.