Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40231796›Full record

Trial reportJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale

Pooled Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Clotrimazole 1% Otic Solution for the Treatment of Otomycosis in Adults.

Ansley J F, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Butehorn H F, Todorov S, Tzvetkov V, Douglis F, Georgiev K, Moreira da Silva F

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The effect of silver nitrate versus clotrimazole in treatment of otomycosis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ansley J FCarolina ENT Clinic (Centri Inc.), Orangeburg, Hickory, SC, USA.
Bernal-Sprekelsen MUniversity of Barcelona Medical School, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8191-9833
Butehorn H FSpartanburg Ear, Nose and Throat-Head and Neck Clinic, P.A., Spartanburg, SC, USA.
Todorov SUMHAT Tsaritsa Yoanna ISUL, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Tzvetkov VMilitary Medical Academy Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment-ENT Clinica, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Douglis FENT Allergy Snoring Center, Conroe, TX, USA.
Georgiev KMilitary Medical Academy Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment, Varna, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-5587-0853
Moreira da Silva FHospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Guimaraes, Braga, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ImportanceThere is no antifungal otic drug for the treatment of otomycosis approved in the United States. Some current clotrimazole formulations in the market are used off-label.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of clotrimazole 1% otic solution compared to placebo in treating otomycosis in adults.DesignTwo independent twin multicenter, randomized (2:1), double-blind, controlled clinical trials with identical designs were conducted from February 2020 to October 2021.SettingFifty-three sites located in the United States, Mexico, and Europe.ParticipantsAdults with uncomplicated otomycosis presented with symptoms, debris, and drainage clinically consistent with fungal infection.InterventionPatients received clotrimazole or placebo twice daily for 14 days and were evaluated on visit 1 (day 1), visit 2 (day 8-10), visit 3 (day 15), and follow-up visit 4 (day 24-26).Main Outcome MeasuresAt each visit, pruritus, otalgia, otorrhea, and ear fullness were assessed. Ear exudate was taken for a mycological and microbiological evaluation at baseline and, if present, at subsequent visits. The primary endpoint was a therapeutic cure (mycological and clinical) at visit 4 in the randomized population with positive fungal culture at baseline [mycological intent-to-treat (MITT)].ResultsThree hundred ninety-three patients received study medication (261 clotrimazole and 132 placebo). Efficacy data from the 228 patients (157 clotrimazole and 71 placebo) included in the MITT were analyzed. The clotrimazole group achieved a higher proportion for the primary endpoint than those with the placebo group (68.2% vs 25.4%;

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsClotrimazoleOtomycosisAdministration, TopicalAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntifungal AgentsClotrimazoleantifungalclotrimazoleotic solutionotomycosis

Identifiers

PMID40231796
PMCPMC12033508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.