ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine
Retrospective Evaluation of Hematological Ratios in Dogs With Nonassociative Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia: 206 Cases.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Findings, Treatment and Long-Term Outcome in 37 Cats with Non-Associative Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia: A Retrospective Observational Study of Two Treatment Cohorts.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Cutaneous Invasive Opportunistic Fungal Infections in Dogs Receiving Ciclosporin for Immune-Mediated Diseases: A Case-Control Study.Veterinary dermatology · 2026Article
- Clinical applications of blood cell ratios in veterinary hematology: From diagnosis to prognosis.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
- Comparative effects of syngeneic graft and xenograft blood for hemolytic anemia modeling in dogs.Open veterinary journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe utility of hematological ratios in immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) in dogs has seldom been investigated. HYPOTHESIS: Hematological ratios are associated with disease severity and outcome in dogs with IMHA. ANIMALS: Two hundred and six client-owned dogs with non-associative IMHA.
methodsRetrospective multicenter study. Medical records were reviewed to identify dogs with non-associative IMHA. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), neutrophil-to-monocyte (NMR), band neutrophil-to-segmented neutrophil (BNR), platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte (MLR), neutrophil-to-platelet (NPR) and red blood cell distribution width-to-platelet (RDWPR) ratios were retrospectively calculated. Their association with hematological variables, number of blood transfusions, and survival at discharge, 1 month, and 6 months was evaluated.
resultsOf the 206 dogs included, 164 (80%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 74-85), 144 (70%, 95% CI: 64-76), and 114 (55%; 95% CI: 48-62) were alive at discharge, one month, and six months, respectively. The hematological ratios were not associated with survival at any time point, regardless of treatment before referral. Only the RDWPR was associated with blood product requirement (odds ratio [OR], 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54-0.91; p < 0.01). Dogs that had received glucocorticoids before referral had a higher 1-month mortality rate compared with glucocorticoid-naïve dogs (73% and 67%, respectively; OR, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1-4.5; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Hematological ratios had limited value in predicting outcome or disease severity in a large population of dogs with non-associative IMHA. Glucocorticoid treatment before referral was independently associated with decreased survival, likely reflecting selection bias toward dogs with more severe disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.