Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40231765›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

Gestational diabetes mellitus and vascular malperfusion lesions in the placenta: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Amrita Arcot, Rachel E Walker, Kelly Gallagher, Jeffery A Goldstein, Alison D Gernand

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Gestational diabetes mellitus and vascular malperfusion lesions in the placenta: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Placental Pathophysiology and Developmental Programming of Adult Cardiometabolic Risk: A Narrative Review of Pregnancy Exposures.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amrita ArcotThe Pennsylvania State University Department of Nutritional Sciences, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7335-414X
Rachel E WalkerThe Pennsylvania State University Department of Nutritional Sciences, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kelly GallagherThe Pennsylvania State University Ross and Carol Nese College of Nursing, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jeffery A GoldsteinNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Department of Pathology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Alison D GernandThe Pennsylvania State University Department of Nutritional Sciences, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5661-7785

Funding

Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of the Maternal Child Health Bureau Nutrition Training Grant, The TRANSCEND Program in Maternal Child Health Nutrition T7949101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can result in increased placental lesions related to high maternal blood glucose, but these relationships are not well understood.

objectiveTo examine the relationship between GDM and placental vascular malperfusion lesions: accelerated villous maturation, increased syncytial knots, delayed villous maturation, and increased fibrin deposition. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, BIOSIS, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for full-text articles in English from inception until August 21, 2024. SELECTION CRITERIA: Our inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials, case-control, cohort, and cross-sectional studies that examined the relationship between GDM and selected placental vascular malperfusion lesions. The outcome must have been reported as a total proportion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We included all eligible studies in narrative synthesis. If an outcome of interest was in at least three studies, we calculated the odds ratios (ORs) by GDM diagnosis, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using mixed-effects logistic regression with random study effects. We evaluated the risk of bias with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. MAIN

resultsWe screened 151 studies, of which eight were included (n = 1291), and six met the criteria for meta-analysis (n = 561). Unadjusted odds (95% CI) of delayed villous maturation were six-fold higher (OR: 6.37 [3.28-12.37]) in pregnancies with GDM than in those without GDM. The narrative synthesis of the literature found higher proportions of increased syncytial knots, delayed villous maturation, and increased fibrin deposition, but not accelerated villous maturation, in pregnancies with versus without GDM.

conclusionsGDM was associated with a higher risk of three placental malperfusion lesions, although there is a small number of studies in this area. Future investigations should examine if these vascular malperfusions are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes often linked with GDM.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalPlacentaPlacenta DiseasesFemaleHumansPregnancyGDMgestational diabetes mellitusplacentaplacental lesionsplacental pathologypregnancy outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40231765
PMCPMC12374022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.