ArticleMolecular oncology2025
A large-scale retrospective study in metastatic breast cancer patients using circulating tumour DNA and machine learning to predict treatment outcome and progression-free survival.
Article in Molecular oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Double-base deletions and signatures associated with platinum adducts in metastatic cancer.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- AI-driven multi-omics integration in breast cancer: clinical applications, immunotherapy prediction, and translational challenges.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- The mechanisms and therapeutic advances of interactions between breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring levels of circulating tumour-derived DNA (ctDNA) provides both a noninvasive snapshot of tumour burden and also potentially clonal evolution. Here, we describe how applying a novel statistical model to serial ctDNA measurements from shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS) in metastatic breast cancer patients produces a rapid and inexpensive predictive assessment of treatment response and progression-free survival. A cohort of 149 patients had DNA extracted from serial plasma samples (total 1013, mean samples per patient = 6.80). Plasma DNA was assessed using sWGS and the tumour fraction in total cell-free DNA estimated using ichorCNA. This approach was compared with ctDNA targeted sequencing and serial CA15-3 measurements. We identified a transition point of 7% estimated tumour fraction to stratify patients into different categories of progression risk using ichorCNA estimates and a time-dependent Cox Proportional Hazards model and validated it across different breast cancer subtypes and treatments, outperforming the alternative methods. We used the longitudinal ichorCNA values to develop a Bayesian learning model to predict subsequent treatment response with a sensitivity of 0.75 and a specificity of 0.66. In patients with metastatic breast cancer, a strategy of sWGS of ctDNA with longitudinal tracking of tumour fraction provides real-time information on treatment response. These results encourage a prospective large-scale clinical trial to evaluate the clinical benefit of early treatment changes based on ctDNA levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.