Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40231643›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Nanoneedle-Based Electroporation for Efficient Manufacturing of Human Primary Chimeric Antigen Receptor Regulatory T-Cells.

Ningjia Sun, Cong Wang, William Edwards, Yikai Wang, Xiangrong L Lu, Chenlei Gu, Samuel McLennan, Panicos Shangaris, Peng Qi, Daniela Mastronicola and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Poking Pluripotency: Nanoinjection Into Human iPSCs.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Oncology research · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The Rise of Mechanobiology for Advanced Cell Engineering and Manufacturing.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ningjia SunCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8803-6339
Cong WangCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
William EdwardsCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Yikai WangCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Xiangrong L LuCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Chenlei GuCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Samuel McLennanCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Panicos ShangarisPeter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Peng QiPeter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Daniela MastronicolaPeter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Cristiano ScottàPeter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Giovanna LombardiPeter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Ciro ChiappiniCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9893-4359

Funding

European Research Council 759577King's-China Scholarship Council 202106230065medical research council under the Confidence in Concept award MC_PC_18052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) play a crucial role in moderating immune responses offering promising therapeutic options for autoimmune diseases and allograft rejection. Genetically engineering Tregs with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) enhances their targeting specificity and efficacy. With non-viral transfection methods suffering from low efficiency and reduced cell viability, viral transduction is currently the only viable approach for GMP-compliant CAR-Treg production. However, viral transduction raises concerns over immunogenicity, insertional mutagenesis risk, and high costs, which limit clinical scalability. This study introduces a scalable nanoneedle electroporation (nN-EP) platform for GMP-compatible transfection of HLA-A2-specific CAR plasmids into primary human Tregs. The nN-EP system achieves 43% transfection efficiency, outperforming viral transduction at multiplicity of infection 1 by twofold. Importantly, nN-EP preserves Treg viability, phenotype and proliferative capacity. HLA-A2-specific CAR-Tregs generated using nN-EP show specific activation and superior suppressive function compared to polyclonal or virally transduced Tregs in the presence of HLA-A2 expressing antigen presenting cells. These findings underscore the potential of nN-EP as a GMP-suitable method for CAR-Treg production, enabling broader clinical application in immune therapies.

Indexed as

ElectroporationReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryHLA-A2 AntigenHumansTransfectionHLA-A2 AntigenReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR‐Telectroporationnanoneedlenanoscale electroporationnon‐viral transfectionregulatory T cellstregs

Identifiers

PMID40231643
PMCPMC12140303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.