Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40231510›Full record

ArticleCurrent HIV research2025

Virological Failure And HIV-1 Drug Resistance in Indian Adults and Adolescents on Protease Inhibitor Based Second-line Antiretroviral Therapy: A Five-year Follow-up Study.

Sumit Arora, Kuldeep Ashta, Nishant Raman, Charu Mohan, N Kisenjang, Vikram Sharma, Anirudh Anilkumar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current HIV research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sumit AroraDepartment of Medicine, Army College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Kuldeep AshtaDepartment of Medicine, Military Hospital, Jalandhar, India.
Nishant RamanDepartment of Medicine, Base Hospital, Delhi, India.
Charu MohanDepartment of Medicine, Army College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
N KisenjangDepartment of Medicine, Base Hospital, Delhi, India.
Vikram SharmaDepartment of Medicine, Base Hospital, Delhi, India.
Anirudh AnilkumarDepartment of Clinical Research, DocSy MedTech, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7280-4196

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the changing HIV treatment landscape, the focus shifts to persons living with HIV (PLH) experiencing virological non-suppression on second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART). This includes understanding viral genetic profiles, antiretroviral susceptibility, and the effectiveness of protease inhibitors (PIs) amid evolving dolutegravir-based regimen recommendations.

methodsIn this retrospective study, PLH with first-line ART failure transitioned to second-line ART (dual NRTI + ritonavir-boosted PI) between September 2015 and October 2018. Eligible patients were ≥ 13 years old, with ≥ 9 months on first-line ART, and confirmed adherence at firstline regimen failure. Conducted at a Northern Indian tertiary hospital, this 5 year follow-up examined virological outcomes and drug resistance. Follow-up included initial viral-load (VL) and CD4 testing at 6-months, subsequent VL testing every 6-12 months, clinical evaluations, and infection screenings. Data on demographics, treatment history, virological-failure (VF), and drug-resistance testing (DRT) (Viroseq HIV-1 genotyping-system) were analysed using Kaplan-Meier and Competing-risk analysis, with appropriate censoring and imputation for events like death, transfer-out, treatment discontinuation/ interruption, loss to follow-up (LTFU), or ART-regimen change.

results219 PLH shifted to ritonavir-boosted PI based second-line ART after 68 (median) months (IQR: 68) of first-line ART exposure and were followed up for 57 (median) months (IQR: 48), totalling 11,548 person-months (PM) of follow-up. Virological outcomes were assessed in 201 PLH. VF cumulative-incidence (Kaplan-Meier-analysis) ranged from 6.9% at 36 months to 15.9% at 60 months. Imputation scenarios showed a potential range, with worst-case incidences of 16.2% at 36 months and 29.4% at 60 months. Cumulative-incidence function (CIF) of VF (Competing-risk-analysis) ranged from 6.5% at 36 months to 12.7% at 60 months. Among 171 PLH with complete VL data, VF incidence was 2.7 per 1000 PM (n=29), with 94.7% achieving nadir VL <1000 cp/mL. VF with PI-mutation (VF-M) analysis, including LTFU patients (n=183), showed CIF for VFM of 2.3% at 36 months and 4.9% at 60 months. DRT (n=23-sequences) revealed 17.4% lopinavir resistance, 34.8% atazanvir resistance, and darunavir (DRV) cross-resistance in three sequences. Overall, 26.1% had no significant drug-resistance mutations, 39.1% had NNRTI resistance, but no PI DRMs, and only 34.8% (of 23-PLH who underwent DRT) potentially required third-line ART.

conclusionThis 5-year longitudinal study highlights the resilience of PIs in second-line ART. The incidence of VF with PI-resistance was notably low, indicating the ongoing effectiveness of PIs in managing PLH on second-line ART and the possibility of recycling PIs in subsequent ART regimens for these patients. Cross-resistance to DRV patients highlights the need for enhanced treatment monitoring.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsDrug Resistance, ViralHIV-1HIV InfectionsHIV Protease InhibitorsAdolescentAdultAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCD4 Lymphocyte CountFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPyridonesAnti-HIV AgentsHIV Protease InhibitorsPyridonesAntiretroviral therapyatazanavirdolutegravirdrug resistancehighly activeHIV infectionsHIV protease inhibitorslopinavirreverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Identifiers

PMID40231510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.