ArticleJournal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution2025
Expression of De Novo Open Reading Frames in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
De novo genes, which originate from noncoding DNA, are known to have a high rate of turnover over short evolutionary timescales, such as within a species. Thus, their expression is often lineage- or genetic background-specific. However, little is known about their levels and breadth of expression as populations of a species diverge. In this study, we utilized publicly available RNA-seq data to examine the expression of newly evolved open reading frames (neORFs) in comparison to non- and protein-coding genes in Drosophila melanogaster populations from the derived species range in Europe and the ancestral range in sub-Saharan Africa. Our datasets included two adult tissue types as well as whole bodies at two temperatures for both sexes and three larval/prepupal developmental stages in a single tissue and sex, which allowed us to examine neORF expression and divergence across multiple sample types as well as sex and population. We detected a relatively large proportion (approximately 50%) of annotated neORFs as expressed in the population samples, with neORFs often showing greater expression divergence between populations than non- or protein-coding genes. However, differential expression of neORFs between populations tended to occur in a sample type-specific manner. On the other hand, neORFs displayed less sex-biased expression than the other two gene classes, with the majority of sex-biased neORFs detected in whole bodies, which may be attributable to the presence of the gonads. We also found that neORFs shared among multiple lines in the original set of inbred lines in which they were first detected were more likely to be both expressed and differentially expressed in the new population samples, suggesting that neORFs at a higher frequency (i.e. present in more individuals) within a species are more likely to be functional.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.