ArticleIranian journal of child neurology2025
Concurrent Validity of the Bayley Screening and the Bayley-III in Persian-Speaking Children.
Article in Iranian journal of child neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to determine the concurrent validity of the Bayley-III and the Bayley screening in Persian-speaking children. Measuring child development with the Bayley-III can be time-consuming and expensive. Accordingly, this research seeks to assess the accuracy of the Bayley screening as a measure of developmental delay for high-risk infants by age group. Materials & Methods: Concurrent validity between raw Bayley screening scores and Bayley-III scores was assessed by administering to 403 1-42 month-old children. The cut score of 1.0 standard deviation below the mean of two tests was calculated using the Bayley-III as the criterion measure. This study used 70% of the sensitivity and specificity cut scores to measure validity. In addition, the study calculated the Pearson and Cohen's kappa correlation for the association between the two measures. Results: The sensitivity of cognitive, receptive, and expressive communication, fine, and gross motor scales of Bayley screening were 70.7, 81.4, 67.7, 60.7, and 58.1, respectively. Specificity values varied narrower, from 87.8% to 100%. The Cohen's kappa coefficient in all age groups was substantial. The Pearson correlation between two test scores is significant for all scales, although the coefficients are over 0.884. The sensitivity and specificity have no specific trends with children's age, and the best sensitivity concurrence on the two tests was in the 1-12 months old age range. Conclusion: The study supports the concurrent validity of the Bayley screening, showing an assertive and significant association between Bayley screening and Bayley-III in Persian-speaking children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.