ArticleOxford open digital health2023
A full-STAC remedy for global digital health transformation: open standards, technologies, architectures and content.
Article in Oxford open digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Patient-Centred AI With Adaptive Machine Learning.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Sustainable artificial intelligence in global health: balancing promise, equity, and environmental realities in low- and middle-income countries.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Enhancing health system governance and citizen empowerment in Bhutan through the Bhutan Vaccine System (BVS): a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Learning as a missing component of digital health, environment and climate change.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- medAL-suite: A software solution for creating and deploying complex clinical decision support algorithms.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Data Interoperability in Context: The Importance of Open-Source Implementations When Choosing Open Standards.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The role of open standards in catalysing knowledge transfer to deliver climate adaptive care.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Navigating complexities: agile digital health initiatives in developing countries.Oxford open digital health · 2024Article
- Together towards tomorrow: partnerships powering the digital transformation of the health sector.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The global digital health ecosystem is project-centric: point solutions are developed for vertical health programs and financed through vertical funding allocations. This results in data fragmentation and technology lock-in, compromising health care delivery. A convergence of trends enabled by interoperability and digital governance makes possible a shift towards person-focused health. Together, open Standards, open Technologies, open Architectures and open Content represent a next-generation 'full-STAC' remedy for digital health transformation. Local developers and implementers can avoid reinventing the wheel, and instead build digital tools suited to local needs-where data travels with an individual over time, evidence-based practice is easily integrated, and insights are gleaned from harmonized data. This is the culmination of the vision endorsed by 194 WHO Member States in the Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020 to 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.