Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40231257›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Safety assessment of ripretinib: a real-world adverse event analysis from the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system.

Sentai Wang, Hewen Chen, Yuying Zhou, Jianfeng Chen, Jiwei Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sentai Wang *Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Hewen Chen *Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Yuying ZhouDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Jianfeng ChenDepartment of General Surgery, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Jiwei CaoDepartment of General Surgery, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ripretinib has been approved for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). As a novel therapy, several adverse reactions remain unidentified, necessitating a thorough safety evaluation. This study analyzes real-world data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to investigate adverse events (AEs) associated with ripretinib. Methods: Adverse event reports (AERs) related to ripretinib were extracted from FAERS ASCII data spanning from the second quarter of 2020 to the second quarter of 2024. Following standardization, various disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical bayes geometric mean (EBGM), were employed to identify potential safety signals linked to ripretinib. The data provided by medical professionals underwent sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of the results. Results: A total of 3,105 ripretinib-related AERs were identified, categorized into 22 system organ classes (SOCs) and 84 preferred terms (PTs). Common AEs, such as alopecia, constipation, and muscle spasms, were consistent with the drug label and clinical trial findings. Notably, the risk of skin cancer associated with ripretinib was further elucidated. Additionally, new signals, including liver abscess and prostatomegaly, were detected. Despite their lower frequency, these signals demonstrated significant strength. A substantial proportion of adverse reactions (n = 322, 39.80%) occurred within the first month of treatment, although a smaller fraction emerged after one year. The sensitivity analysis revealed that most PTs related to skin and subcutaneous tissue maintained high signal values, with 8 cases of skin squamous cell carcinoma-related AEs still reported. Conclusion: The findings of this study align with established drug guidance and uncover new adverse event signals for ripretinib, thereby enhancing clinical monitoring and facilitating risk identification.

Indexed as

adverse eventdisproportionality analysisFAERSpharmacovigilance studyripretinib

Identifiers

PMID40231257
PMCPMC11994415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.