Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40231227›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025

Machine learning models to predict 6-month mortality risk in home-based hospice patients with advanced cancer.

Wan Cheng, Jianwei Zheng, Yuanfeng Lu, Guojuan Chen, Zheng Zhu, Hong Wu, Yitao Wei, Huimin Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wan ChengSchool of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Jianwei ZhengDepartment of Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yuanfeng LuSchool of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Guojuan ChenSchool of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Zheng ZhuSchool of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hong WuDepartment of Hospice Care, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yitao WeiSchool of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Huimin XiaoSchool of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to construct predictive models using five different machine learning algorithms for predicting 6-month mortality risk among home-based hospice patients with advanced cancer. Methods: This population-based retrospective prognostic study examined data from 7023 patients in a home-based hospice center. Various algorithms including logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, support vector machine, and neural network were implemented in this study. The model performance and effectiveness were assessed using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, the area under the curve (AUC), and F1 Score. Additionally, a nomogram was developed to calculate individualized risk probabilities, enhancing clinical utility. Results: Among the five types of predictive models, the logistic regression model achieved an AUC of 0.754 (95% CI: 0.721-0.786) in the test dataset, outperforming other machine learning algorithms. The nomogram developed from the logistic regression model included 10 independent risk factors for 6-month mortality. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed no significant difference between the predicted and observed outcomes (training set: 12.646, Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that routinely collected healthcare data on the first home visit have the potential to help screen high-risk patients, which may provide evidence for targeted hospice care.

Indexed as

Hospice careMortality riskPredictionTerminal cancer

Identifiers

PMID40231227
PMCPMC11995133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.