Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40231219›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025

Initial and persistent changes in cancer screening in a US Midwestern community health center network following the onset of COVID-19.

Lawrence C An, Amy Zarr-McDonagh, Andrew Krumm, Elizabeth Bacon, Celeste Liebrecht, Halli Rennaker, Faiyaz Syed, Ken Resnicow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lawrence C AnUniversity of Michigan Medical School Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, United States.
Amy Zarr-McDonaghMichigan Primary Care Association, United States.
Andrew KrummUniversity of Michigan Medical School Department of Learning Health Sciences, United States.
Elizabeth BaconUniversity of Michigan Center for Health Communications Research, United States.
Celeste LiebrechtUniversity of Michigan Medical School Department of Learning Health Sciences, United States.
Halli RennakerMichigan Primary Care Association, United States.
Faiyaz SyedMichigan Primary Care Association, United States.
Ken ResnicowUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, United States.

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess longer-term change in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening among Community Health Centers (CHCs) following onset of COVID-19. Methods: Among 27 CHCs in the US Midwest, we examine trends in standard electronic clinical quality measures and test-volume based cancer screening measures from January 2019 through October 2021. Test-volume measures include the number of cancer screening tests completed, the difference between the actual versus expected cumulative number of tests completed (i.e. pandemic screening gap), and the recent testing ratio (i.e. proportion of individuals up-to-date on screening who completed testing in the past year). Results: Standard cancer screening quality measures showed only modest changes. In contrast, test-volume measures show large and persistent deficits. After a sharp drop in screening activity in early 2020, activity resumed but failed to reach pre-pandemic levels. As a result, the pandemic screening gap continued to grow larger over time reaching approximately 5400 fewer breast, 8600 fewer cervical, and 4500 fewer colorectal cancer screenings performed. This represents a 16-18 % deficit in the number of tests and is the equivalent of 3.5-4.0 months of dedicated pre-pandemic cancer screening activity. The recent testing ratio also decreased in 2020 and also failed to return to pre-pandemic levels. Conclusions: Following onset of COVID-19, there was a persistent negative change in cancer screening in our CHC network. This change is more evident when examining test-volume compared to standard quality metrics. Understanding and addressing the persistent pandemic cancer screening gap is critical to limit health burdens and disparities related to cancer.

Indexed as

Breast cancer screeningCancer screeningCervical cancer screeningColorectal cancer screeningCommunity health centerCOVID-19PandemicQuality measuresTest volume

Identifiers

PMID40231219
PMCPMC11994969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.