Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40231160›Full record

ReviewInnovation in aging2025

Young Adult Caregivers for Older Family Members: Setting a New Research Agenda.

Karen L Fingerman, Zexi Zhou, William E Haley, Steven H Zarit

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innovation in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gender and racial/ethnic disparities in the life-course timing of first unpaid caregiving: a survival analysis approach.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. When family caregiving happens: life-course timing and health outcomes in later life.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen L FingermanDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9260-9400
Zexi ZhouDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7817-724X
William E HaleySchool of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Steven H ZaritDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

EXPANDING MHAS RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE WITH HISTORICAL CLIMATE AND LIFETIME WORKPLACE ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES INFLUENCING INEQUITIES IN AD/ADRDP30AG066589 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DANA P GOLDMAN, JULIE M ZISSIMOPOULOS · 2020 to 2026
$6.1M
Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Elizabeth T. Gershoff · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066589NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Young adults (approximately aged 18 to 29) are frequently involved in caring for older relatives, potentially filling gaps and playing key roles in the network of caregivers. The time is ripe to synthesize the emerging literature on this topic and propose an agenda for future research. This article identifies key questions for research that will propel the field forward, including: (a) why young adult caregiving warrants distinct consideration from caregiving in midlife or later life, (b) young adult caregivers' position in the caregiving network and tasks they perform, and (c) factors that help determine who becomes a caregiver at this stage of life and who does not, with attention to race/ethnicity, and beliefs about family interdependency. We then address appraisals of caregiving stress, rewards, and potential factors that may buffer the negative impact of caregiving at this stage of life. We extend this discussion to the detriments and benefits of caregiving for well-being. We consider longer-term enduring positive and negative consequences of caregiving at this potentially transformative stage of adulthood. Throughout this article, we review many of the founding studies and scholars who have laid the groundwork in this emerging field and point out the components of existing models of caregiving that particularly apply to young adult caregivers. We conclude with suggestions for potential policies and programs to allow for young adults to engage in caregiving while also pursuing the roles and activities that align with their values and set them up for a successful adulthood.

Indexed as

CaregivingEmerging adulthoodFamily supportTransition to adulthoodYouth carer

Identifiers

PMID40231160
PMCPMC11995456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.