Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40231142›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025

Post-cementation sensitivity of bridges cemented with different adhesive resin cements.

Diaaeldin Farag, Abdelrahman Almufti, Mohamad Alghalayini, Nasser Shaheen, Mahmoud Darwish, Sherif Sadek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diaaeldin FaragBDS, MSc, PhD, Associate Professor of Prosthodontics, Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE. Department of Crown & Bridge, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Abdelrahman AlmuftiBDS, MSD Prosthodontics. Image Dental Clinic, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamad AlghalayiniMSc Student Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia.
Nasser ShaheenProfessor of Prosthodontics, Restorative and Prosthetic Dental Sciences Department, Dar Al Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mahmoud DarwishAssociate Professor of Prosthodontics. Department of Prosthodontics, Vision College, Riyadh, KSA. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Sherif SadekAssociate Professor of Prosthodontics. Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE. Associate Professor Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Post-cementation sensitivity remains a common clinical concern in fixed partial dentures (FPDs), with variations in adhesive resin cement formulations influencing patient discomfort and long-term success. This study aimed to compare post-cementation sensitivity in FPDs cemented with three different resin cements: self-adhesive resin cements, resin cement with a self-etch adhesive, and resin cement with an etch-and-rinse adhesive. Material and Methods: A total of 27 patients demanding the replacement of one missing posterior tooth with a FPD were selected for the study. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups based on the type of cement used. The abutments, which were caries- and restoration-free, were prepared using standard techniques. In total, 68 abutment teeth were prepared across all patients, of which 65 were vital abutments. The FPDs were cemented using one of the following cements: Multilink Speed (MUS) (self-adhesive resin cement), Rely-X Unicem (RXU) (self-adhesive resin cement), Rely-X Ultimate & Single Bond Universal (RXUS) (self-etch adhesive mode), and Rely-X Ultimate & Single Bond Universal (RXUE) (etch-and-rinse mode). Sensitivity to cold water, air and biting was assessed pre-operatively as a control and post-operatively at 24 hours, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The data were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Sensitivity to cold decreased significantly for most cements within 2 to 6 weeks, although VAS scores for RXUE remained above the 30% level. RXUE also exhibited significantly higher sensitivity to biting compared to Multilink Speed (MUS), Rely-X Unicem (RXU), and Rely-X Ultimate in self-etch mode (RXUS). MUS showed no biting sensitivity, while RXU and RXUS displayed mean values below 5% at the 2-week mark. Conclusions: The use of self-adhesive resin cements (MUS and RXU) and the resin cement with self-etch adhesive (RXUS) resulted in significantly lower post-operative sensitivity compared to the resin cement with etch-and-rinse adhesive (RXUE) in FPDs. Clinical Application: When cementing FPDs, particularly in cases involving freshly cut dentin, it is advisable to use self-adhesive cements or resin cements with self-etch adhesive.

Identifiers

PMID40231142
PMCPMC11994206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.