ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Effect of precooling on the assessment of pain during local anesthesia in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Various methods aim to reduce pain from local anesthesia injections. While commonly used, topical anesthetics have limitations. This systematic review aimed to assess whether precooling is a more effective alternative to topical anesthetics for pain control during local anesthesia injections in adults. Material and Methods: The review followed PRISMA guidelines and used the PICO framework. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023446314). Independent searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science for studies published up to November 2024. Articles meeting the eligibility criteria were included. Data were extracted by one author and verified by another. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate pain between the precooling and topical anesthetic groups after anesthesia and during needle insertion. Results: Eight randomized clinical trials met the inclusion criteria, with a combined sample of 415 patients. Six of the eight studies reported lower pain scores in patients who received precooling compared to those treated with topical anesthetics. Various agents were used for both local cooling and topical anesthesia. Meta-analysis showed statistically significant pain reduction in favor of precooling after anesthesia; however, no significant differences were found during needle insertion. Conclusions: Precooling may be an effective alternative to topical anesthetics, reducing pain associated with needle insertion and anesthetic injection in adults. Further research is warranted to establish a standardized application protocol.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.