ArticleHeart rhythm O22025
Epicardial access for ventricular tachycardia and premature ventricular complexes ablation: An institutional experience.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Outcomes in Patients Without Previous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Insertion: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epicardial access for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation is a challenging and relatively uncommon procedure during ventricular ablation. Objective: This study aimed to assess the outcomes, predictors of success, and complications associated with pericardial access during these procedures. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included data collected over 20 years (2004-2024) from all Mayo Clinic sites performing VA ablation with epicardial access. Results: A total of 265 patients were included in the analysis: 196 for VT ablation and 69 for PVC ablation. Among them, 184 (69%) had at least 1 previous VA ablation, 51 (19.2%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy, 53 (20%) had structurally normal hearts, and 164 (61.9%) had nonischemic cardiomyopathies (NICMs). Three presented with concomitant ischemic cardiomyopathy and NICM. Within the NICM group, the most common diagnoses were dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 80 [30.2%]), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (n = 34 [12.8%]), and sarcoidosis (n = 15 [5.7%]). Acute success, defined as noninducibility, was achieved in 100 (61.7%) of 162 patients tested, while partial success (clinical arrhythmia noninduciblility) was observed in 47 (29%). Before discharge, VT recurred in 20 patients (10.2%). During a median follow-up of 61 months, events were observed as follows: 60 (35.5%) patients died, 26 (13.3%) underwent heart transplantation, and 62 (31.6%) required a repeat ablation for VAs. The event-free survival rates were 50% (95% confidence interval 43%-58%) at 1 year. Conclusion: Successful VT ablation with epicardial access can be achieved in select cases, though event-free survival remains suboptimal. Advanced disease stage and persistent inducibility at the end of the procedure are predictors of poor outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.