ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Comparison of the analgesic effects of liposomal bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and surgeon-administered intercostal nerve block following video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing post-thoracotomy pain management: comparing erector spinae vs. paravertebral block in thoracotomy patients: a prospective randomized study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Evolving Trends and Core Contributors: A Bibliometric Update on Liposomal Bupivacaine.Pain research & management · 2026Article
- Effect of Liposomal Bupivacaine for Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block on Early Postoperative Recovery Quality in Elderly Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Liposomal bupivacaine vs. Ropivacaine for wound infiltration on chronic postsurgical pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery: protocol for a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and thoracoscopic intercostal nerve block (ICNB) in thoracic surgery remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of anesthesiologist-performed ESPB using LB versus surgeon-administrated ICNB with LB in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lung resection. Methods: This single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial will include 120 adult patients scheduled for VATS lung resection. Patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to the ESPB group or ICNB group. Each patient will receive either an ESPB or ICNB at the end of the surgery, along with patients-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) as part of a postoperative multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome is the average numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores at rest over 72 h postoperatively (average of three 24-h time points: 24, 48, and 72 h). Secondary outcomes include NRS pain scores at rest and during activity at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively, Quality of Recovery 15 scores at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively, time to first press on the PCIA device, total opioid consumption within 72 h postoperatively, time to initiate independent bedside mobilization, length of postoperative hospital stay, and the incidence of chronic pain (defined as an NRS score ≥ 1) at 3 months post-surgery. Analyses will be performed in the modified intention-to-treat population. Discussion: We hypothesize that anesthesiologist-performed ultrasound-guided ESPB with liposomal bupivacaine will result in lower average numeric rating scale pain scores over 72 h compared to surgeon-administrated thoracoscopic ICNB in patients undergoing VATS lung resection. The findings of this study aim to provide evidence to optimize postoperative analgesic regimens for patients undergoing VATS lung resection. Clinical trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2400092927.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.