ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Multimodal diaphragmatic ultrasound indicators in healthy adults: reliability and consistency observation by ultrasound physician and critical care physician.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic assessment of the COPD patient: it is time to consider respiratory muscle ultrasound.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- M-Mode and Tissue Doppler Ultrasonographic Assessment of Diaphragmatic Function in Dogs With and Without Respiratory Distress.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Ultrasound Evaluation of Diaphragmatic and Intercostal Muscle Function as an Indicator of COPD Severity: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to establish normal reference values for multimodal diaphragmatic ultrasound indices in healthy adult volunteers and evaluate intra-and inter-observer consistency between ultrasound physicians and critical care physicians. Methods: An ultrasound physician (US physician) used techniques such as B-mode, M-mode, Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI), and shear wave elastography (SWE) to measure diaphragmatic parameters in 46 healthy adults during quiet and deep breathing. A critical care physician (CC physician) trained in diaphragmatic ultrasound repeated these measurements. Consistency was analyzed in intra-researcher and inter-researchers of various diaphragmatic ultrasound indicators. Results: Diaphragm thickness at the end of expiration, end of inspiration, and end of deep inspiration (DT-ee, DT-ei, and DT-edi) in both B-mode and M-mode method of males were higher than that of females, Diaphragm shear modulus-edi of males is higher than that of females ( Conclusion: Ultrasound-based assessment of diaphragmatic function is a reliable method. This study provides normal reference values and highlights the high observer reproducibility among experienced ultrasound and critical care physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.