Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40231074›Full record

ReviewPublic health reviews2025

A Scoping Review Investigating the International Economic Evidence to Inform the Development of a Career Pathway for Home Support Workers.

M Lynch, E Morrow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M LynchFaculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
E MorrowFaculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this scoping review is to explore the international evidence to identify the potential costs and gains of the development of a career pathway for Health Support Worker's (HSW's), the economic gains and benefits connected with continual professional development (CPD) and value for money. Methods: Scoping review following JBI methodology was conducted of peer-reviewed international literature using structured searches of electronic databases and grey literature (September 2013-November 2023) applying economic methodological terms to capture economic evidence and perspectives on the issues. Results: Seventeen papers were critically appraised and during the process of data extraction four key themes emerged: 1) Cost-benefits of employment and training 2) Organisational economic perspectives 3) Service economic perspectives and 4) Sector economic perspectives. This scoping review revealed a scarcity of economic evidence contributing to critical educational approaches, costs and benefits in development of career pathways for HSWs. Conclusion: Limited evidence was available on benefits of specific training programmes, and considerable gaps in the evidence to inform future investment. Recommendation is that future research should incorporate economic theory within evaluations to inform policy and practice.

Indexed as

career pathwaycontinuous professional developmenteconomichealth support workertraining programs

Identifiers

PMID40231074
PMCPMC11995192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.